Tag Archives: Buffett

Franchise Lab Test: Coinstar (CSTR)

Buffett´s definition of a franchise is its ability to raise prices while retaining
customers. A franchise is like an inflation pass-through. A potential case
study for those seeking to test whether a company truly is a franchise is when
the company does raise prices.

Coinstar´s Share Price Drops on Price Hike

Today (Friday, October 28, 2011) we have Coinstar´s (CSTR) shares falling nearly 9% at midday, under pressure after the Bellevue, Wash.-based company /quotes/zigman/63447/quotes/nls/cstr CSTR -9.05% said late Thursday that it would raise the price of renting a standard-definition DVD at a Redbox kiosk to $1.20 a day from $1, effective Oct. 31. Blu-Ray DVD rentals will still cost between $1.50 and $2 a day.

In a statement, Chief Executive Paul Davis said the price hike, the first
for Redbox in eight years, was necessary due to higher operating expenses including recent increases in debit-card transaction fees, an outgrowth of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. (See how consumers get ¨protected¨by new regulation-the law of unintended consequences).

Read the entire article here:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/coinstar-slumps-in-wake-of-redbox-rate-hike-2011-10-28?siteid=bigcharts&dist=bigcharts

Readers of this blog and students of Austrian economics are about as surprised to see rising prices-the effects of dollar debasement by the Fed-as being in a rain
storm in the tropics.

Lab Test

I am not implying that Coinstar is a franchise, but this is as close to a lab test as
you will see in investing. If you were analyzing Coinstar you would need to
monitor closely whether the company´s market share and profitability decline.
If either metric declines, then the company is not a franchise because the
company can´t pass through increased costs in the form of higher prices.

Be on the alert for potential case studies, there are lessons everywhere.

Coinstar´s Investor Relation´s website:

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=92448&p=irol-IRHome

Bridge & Buffett, Poker, and Investing

As students of investing we want to improve our skills though studying great investors, understanding and applying the proper principles and learning from case studies to make our education less costly, more profitable.

Only you can do the hard work of introspection of what your strengths and weaknesses. One fun way to improve is to play bridge or poker.  Buffett plays bridge as described here:

http://www.hussman.net/wmc/wmc061127.htm

Why Warren Buffett plays bridge

Aside from an affection for cheeseburgers and Cherry Coke, one of the personal facts commonly known about Warren Buffett is his love of bridge, which he periodically plays online with Bill Gates.

Why bridge? Though Graham wasn’t talking about Buffett at the time, he
offers a clue:

“I recall to those of you who are bridge players the emphasis that bridge experts place on playing a hand right rather than on playing it successfully. Because, as you know, if you play it right you are going to make money and if you play it wrong you lose money – in the long run.

There is a beautiful little story about the man who was the weaker bridge player of the husband-and-wife team. It seems he bid a grand slam, and at the end he said very triumphantly to his wife ‘I saw you making faces at me all the time, but you notice I not only bid this grand slam but I made it. What can you say about that?’ And his wife replied very dourly, ‘If you had played it right you would have lost it.’”

It takes an enormous amount of restraint to focus on playing every investment hand “right,” according to an established discipline, allowing the law of averages to work in your favor, rather than trying to win every hand. I would guess that this is exactly what appeals to Warren Buffett’s temperament. Over the long-term, good investing requires it.

Those quotes are excerpted from Hussman Funds. I recommend you bookmark this website: http://www.hussmanfunds.com/

Play Poker

My plug is to suggest a few hands of poker.

There are few things that are so unpardonably neglected in our country as poker. It is enough to make me ashamed of one´s species. Mark Twain.

If you look around the table and you can´t tell who the sucker is, it´s you. Paul Scofield, playing the role of Mark Van Doren in Quiz Show.

Poker, the game exemplifies the worst aspects of capitalism that have made our country so great. Walter Matthau.

A guy walks into a bar and notices three men and a dog playing poker. The dog is playing beautifully. ¨That´s a very smart dog,¨ the man says. ¨Not really¨ says one of the players. ¨Every time he gets a good hand he wags his tail.¨

Depend on the rabbit´s foot if you will but remember, it didn´t work for the rabbit. Anonymous.

Poker will teach you about odds, money management, human psychology and your own temperament.  An important lesson for investors is to maximize your winning investments. Joel Greenblatt, George Soros, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger all were experts at heavily weighting their best investments because they could distinguish good opportunities.  They knew the importance of being paid well for finding the rare opportunity.  A few weeks ago in early October we had (and may still have) cheap valuations on some quality companies (AMAT, CSCO, MSFT, MDT, NVS, SYK–in my opinion and easy now to say in retrospect) because we had low expectations for growth, high anxiety, and hyper easy monetary conditions. Opportunities like that don´t appear often. Make the most of your chance. Now pundits are saying we are not going into a recession; where were they last month?

Poker STrategy

Poker strategy will drive home that lesson in spades (sorry). Poker is beautifully
simple, wildly complicated, and in its essence, pure Machiavelli and Sun Tzu,
if one plays better than the other, if he out-thinks and out-strategies, then
he will win the most money. Poker isn´t about the number of pots you take down, or how fantastic you look winning them. Claiming a pot when you have the best cards isn´t enough to make you a winning player. Remember, there is no grand pay scale for holding the best hand. No one gives you a pile of money for drawing a royal straight flush. Some sucker has to pay you off. You have to
maximize profits through guile and savvy, eke out every last dollar that your
competition is willing to lose to you–and, when you don´t have the winning
cards, flee as fast as possible. (Poker Nation by Andy Bellin).

Good luck and rub that rabbit´s foot.

Case Study: Berkshire Hathaway–Avoiding Value Traps

A contributor, Sid Berger, generously provided us with a concise case study. Thank you Sid.

Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. Case Study – Avoiding Value Traps

“All I want to know is where I’m going to die so I’ll never go there.” – Charlie Munger

This article is the first in a series of case studies highlighting mistakes by famous value investors. This concept was unashamedly stolen from Mohnish Pabrai. See here for the article http://www.gurufocus.com/news/137071/mohnish-pabrai–his-project-to-learn-from-other-successful-investors-includes-comments-on-dell-and-aig.

In 1962, Warren Buffet came across a struggling textile manufacturer named Berkshire Hathaway. By any measure, the company was cheap. He bought shares from 1962-1965 at an average price of $14.86. This price was 22% below its December 31, 1965 net working capital of $19 per share.

It looked like a classic Grahamian purchase of a company for less than liquidation value. Buffett recognized that the business was unexciting but likely to generate a couple of good quarters which would give the stock price a temporary boost. Yet, Buffett let emotion rule and held on to the business and continued to plow more money into it. He finally pulled the plug in 1985.

What was wrong with Buffet’s investment process that led him to make this mistake? Could it have been avoided?

Buffett himself did a great post-mortem analysis in his 1985 letter to shareholders http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/1985.html. I will draw upon that letter here but will expand upon some of the concepts and highlight their broader applicability.

First off, the company had absolutely no moat. That is, it had no durable competitive advantages such as brand name. To paraphrase Buffet, they couldn’t charge two cents more than their competitors because consumers had to have a Berkshire lining in their suit.

Second, textiles are an industry with no or low barriers to entry. As a result, any capex was simply wasted as all market participants countered with investments of their own. Standing on its own, Berkshire was presented with investment choices that would produce great returns. But, the investments were neutralized by each of the competitors making investments of their own. As Buffet stated, such a situation is like spectators at a parade all standing on their tiptoes to catch a better view – not much is actually accomplished.

Buffet also seems to have missed or at least minimized the threat of low-cost overseas competition. There were non-US textile mills where employees were willing to work for a fraction of Berkshire’s workers. Could Buffet have seen this coming? It’s difficult for me determine as I am not an expert on the textile industry of the mid-Sixties. He does note in his 1985 letter to Berkshire Shareholders that manufacturers in the Southern part of the US were thought to have an advantage over Berkshire because of their non-unionized workforce. So, he was at least aware that labor costs could be an issue.

More broadly, turnarounds seldom turn. Even the most gifted manager will have difficulty turning around a struggling company in a declining industry. As Buffet stated, “When a management team with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is the reputation of the business that remains intact.” Buffet convinced himself that new management could turn around the Berkshire business, but the secular decline in the US textile industry was too much for anyone to defeat.

Also, if you’re producing a commodity, you better be the lowest cost producer. A low-cost structure is a powerful competitive advantage in that it enables a company to generate higher profits that it can reinvest into its business and distance itself from its competition. A low-cost structure also provides a business flexibility to use price as a weapon to take market share, weakening higher cost competitors who must match price and risk potential losses.

The Berkshire episode also contributed to Buffet’s move away from anchoring valuations on the balance sheet. For one thing, appraisals of liquidation value are typically unreliable. Buffet notes that Berkshire’s assets had been acquired for $13 million, had book value (after accelerated depreciation) of $866,000 and had replacement cost of $30-50 million. At auction, they fetched $163,122 gross or less than 0 net of expenses.

What checklist items does this case study produce? 1. Can the company be killed by low-cost overseas competition? 2. Is it a turnaround situation? Is this a mere blip (Amex) or an industry in secular decline (Berkshire)? Will it take large amounts of capex to turn it around? 3. Does the company have a moat? Does the industry have barriers to entry? Does the company have pricing power? 4. If the company produces a commodity, is it the low-cost producer?

Compare Berkshire with a Buffet success, See’s Candy. See’s Candy was a high quality business with durable competitive advantages that needed little capex and drowned in cash flow. Unfortunately, some companies failed to learn these lessons – even in the same industry.

See the Munsingwear case study, http://csinvesting.org/2011/09/12/case-study-munsingwear-a-test-in-thinking-strategically/. There, management continued to reinvest in the textile industry even though it was losing money on every sale.

How do these lessons apply to a company like Dell, which shows up in the portfolios of a lot of prominent value investors? In 2004, IBM sold off its PC division. At the time, the IBM CEO explained that the PC had become commodity-like and returns were unlikely to exceed IBM’s cost of capital. Is the US PC business the 2011 version of the New England textile industry in 1965?

Lectures on Behavioral Finance, Buffett and Munger

Since this blog is a learning resource, I will happily point you to other websites/blogs where you can learn.

Sanjay Bakshi is an investor and professor in India who applied the lessons of Graham, Buffett, and Munger to his teachings and investing. I recommend: http://www.sanjaybakshi.net/Sanjay_Bakshi/BFBV.html

You can download 9 lectures and peruse his site. Also, a student organized a few of his past posts–perhaps an easier way to find your interests.

http://kiraninvestsandlearns.wordpress.com/prof-sanjay-bakshis-posts/

Sanjay’s site will help deepen and broaden your thinking. For example:

Nothing is more dangerous than an idea when it is the only one you have–Emile Auguste Chartier

Why should I buy this stock?

Because it is cheap!

Under what circumstances would this be a mistake? Name three reasons why you could be wrong?

  1. Fraud
  2. Value Trap (declining industry)
  3. Bubble Market

I followed a golden rule that namely whenever a new observation or thought came across me, which was opposed to my general results to make a memorandum of it without fail and at once for I had found by experience that such facts or thoughts were more apt to escape from the memory than favorable ones. –Charles Darwin

I will post other recommended blogs, but when they fit a context.

Lecture 10: Analyzing Moody’s and Using Buffett’s Purchase of Coke as a Comparable

The art of investment has one characteristic that is not generally appreciated. A credible, if unspectacular, result can be achieved by the lay investor with a minimum of effort and capability; but to improve this easily attainable standard requires much application and more than a trace of wisdom.  — Ben Graham, The Intelligent Investor.

It’s not supposed to be easy. Anyone who finds it easy is stupid. — Charlie Munger.

Please use the link below to read this lecture on Moody’s.  You will learn how a great investor used Buffett’s purchase of Coke in 1988 to make a case for buying Moody’s in 2000 at a high multiple (21) of earnings.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/69137839/Lecture-10-Moody-s-Corporation-Example

Note how this Great Investor is focused on quality companies. You will not learn in business school his creative comparison of two companies at different times and in different industries.

A Great Investor’s 2006 Lecture on Investment Philosophy and Process

Another lecture to MBAs in our continuing series from one great investor.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/67911665/Great-Investor-2006-Lecture-on-Investment-Philosophy-and-Process

Buffett Lecture at UF 1998 on Life and Business Analysis

The 20 page Pdf file is downloadable here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/65386210/Buffett-Lecture-Fla-Univ-Sch-of-Business-1998

Note Buffett’s approach to analyzing Coke and P&G. What does he ignore versus what is important. Write down what you learn from this lecture and how you will apply those lessons to your own investing.

I am still learning from this lecture even after my 27th reading. Hey, I am slow!

Buffett Investment Filters and CS on Mid-Continent Tabulating Company

Granted Buffett is an obsessive genius.  But even a new investor can learn how he saves time by what is important in an investment’s success and how hard he works. Proper habits drive his results. We can’t become another Buffett, but a careful reading of this case study will dramatically help you as an investor. Focus on a huge margin of safety in your investments rather than predicting the future with a pro-forma spread-sheet model.

The link is here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/65352277/CS-of-Buffett-Filter-on-Catastrophic-Risk.

Inflation, Hyperinflation and Investing with Klarman, Buffett and Graham

Investing and Inflation

Americans are getting stronger.  Twenty years ago, it took two people to carry ten dollars’ worth of groceries. Today a five year-old can do it. – Henry  Youngman.[1]

The best investing article on investing this editor has ever read:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/65198264/Inflation-Swindles-the-Equity-Investor

If you  grasp what Buffett is saying, your results will improve. Inflation is the major  concern of any investor. You should measure your investment success not just by  what you make in nominal terms but by how much you keep after inflation. Take out a dollar from your purse or wallet. You  are taking a dollar today to invest  in a claim in a capital good (stock or bond of a company) to be able to consume  the same or more goods and services in the future.

An  interesting blog discusses Buffett’s above article and comments further on
inflation here: http://www.valueinvestingworld.com/2009/06/warren-buffetts-comments-on-inflation.html  and click on the pdf file (100 pages) which
aggregates all of Buffett’s writings on inflation and investing. http://www.chanticleeradvisors.com/files/107293/Buffett%20inflation%20file.pdf.

After reading those  articles, take a minute to download the 50-year charts on

Proctor & Gamble (PG): http://www.scribd.com/doc/65206655/Proctor-Gamble-50-Year-Chart

Coke (KO): http://www.scribd.com/doc/65206606/Coke-50-Year-Chart-SRC

US Steel (X):  http://www.scribd.com/doc/65207037/US-Steel-50-Year-Chart-SRC

Goodyear Tire & Rubber: GT: http://www.scribd.com/doc/65207109/GT-50-Year-Chart-SRC

I recommend going to www.srcstockcharts.com and consider
subscribing to their 35-year or 50-year stock charts as a way to understand the
long-term cyclicality of businesses. You might be amazed at the differences in
performance and persistence between good and bad businesses. As the world
focuses more on the short-term, I urge you to develop more long-term analysis.
Stocks are theoretically perpetual ownership interests unlike bonds.  It’s silly to focus on next quarter’s earnings and think that will have a major impact on intrinsic values.

Four companies is not a statistical relevant example size. Also, one has to be careful of hindsight bias and fitting a theory to the facts, but how does Buffett’s
article tie into these empirical results? What can you use from your analysis
to become a better investor? Thoughts? Hint: I learned to go where the living is easy not to solve tough problems.

Understanding the dangers of inflation is critical now
because of the monetary and credit distortions building up in the world’s
monetary system as the links below will show. A true understanding will require
a huge effort, but you have no choice if you wish to understand the challenges
and conditions you face as an investor.

Many traditional value investors believe an investor should avoid macro forecasting and just do bottom-up company-specific analysis.  I don’t believe you need to forecast markets but one must understand the current dangers and risks confronting him or her when valuing businesses. Not to have been aware of the unusual credit conditions in the housing market during 2003 to 2007 would have meant attaching unusually high normalized earnings to homebuilding stocks while in a housing bubble.

Hindsight bias? A stopped clock is always right twice? Several investors were screaming from the rooftops about the  bubble building in housing. Go here for a ten minute clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZaHNeNgrcI.
For a more in depth analysis of the causes of the housing bubble by the same
analyst: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jj8rMwdQf6k.
By the way, the point is not the successful prediction but the reasoning behind his analysis. If you don’t understand economics you are like a one-legged man in an ass-kicking contest. Thanks Mr. Munger.

No greater value investor than Seth A. Karman in his introduction to Security Analysis, 6th Edition (2009) writes on pages, xxxii to xxxiii:

Another important factor for value investors to take into account is the growing propensity of the Federal Reserve to intervene in financial markets at the first sign of trouble. Amidst severe turbulence, the Fed frequently lowers interest rates to prop up securities prices and investor confidence. While the intention of the Fed officials is to maintain orderly capital markets, some money managers view Fed intervention as a virtual license to speculate. Aggressive Fed tactics, sometimes referred to as the “Greenspan put” (now the “Bernanke put”), create a moral hazard that encourages speculation while prolonging overvaluation. So long as value investors aren’t lured into a false sense of security, so long as they can maintain a long-term horizon and ensure their staying power, market dislocations caused by Fed action (or investor anticipation of it may ultimately be a source of opportunity.

TODAY

Now for the current (2011):

A  monetary tsunami is coming: http://mises.org/daily/5597

Defining inflation: http://mises.org/daily/908

Just don’t believe what you read, go to the primary sources:

Current Money Stock Measures which are rising as fast as they did in the 1970s: http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/H6/Current/

You need understanding to place those statistics into context.  The effects of inflation are rising prices in general or a decreased decline in some prices absent money printing. The effects are not just a result of the increased supply of money but the demand to hold money.

The pernicious effects of inflation:

http://mises.org/resources.aspx?Id=7215a07f-1a67-475e-90af-5789b7c82223

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul728.html

Why gold prices are so high: http://mises.org/daily/5652/Why-Are-Gold-Prices-So-High

HYPERINFLATION

I am not  implying impending hyperinflation but understand the worst case scenario. The US has suffered two hyper-inflations (The
Confederate Greenback and the US Continental Dollar). The dollar’s exchange
value has declined as shown here: http://mykindred.com/cloud/TX/Documents/dollar/
and for further clarification go here: http://www.financialsensearchive.com/fsu/editorials/dollardaze/2009/0223.html

As  investors we must also be prepared to understand worst case scenarios like hyperinflation. See video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzV9WZhhKrM&feature=related.  The Weimar hyperinflation destroyed the
wealth of Germany’s middle class. The social devastation helped usher
in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCwV75obpYk&feature=related
Hitler. May we never forget the lessons of history.

BOOKS

THE best book on understanding the causes and effects of hyperinflation is The Economics of Inflation by Constantino Bresciani-Turroni, download the book here: http://mises.org/books/economicsofinflation.pdf

When Money Dies: The Nightmare of Deficit Spending, Devaluation, and Hyperinflation in Weimar Germany by Adam Fergusson (1975, Reprint
2010). This is the “narrative description” of Bresciani’s book. The horror. Finally, another good read: Fiat Inflation in  France by White: http://mises.org/books/inflationinfrance.pdf

If you live in the USA or Europe and are not aware of the current dangers and what could happen, you are living a high-wire  act.


[1] Intelligent Investor, Chapter 2: The Investor and  Inflation by Benjamin Graham.