Great Investor Series: Shelby Cullom Davis 23.18% CAGR over 47 Years in Insurance Stocks

One day the Nouns were clustered in the street.

An Adjective walked by, with her dark beauty.

The Nouns were struck, moved, changed.

The next day a Verb drove up, and created the Sentence.

–Kenneth Koch, “Permanently”

Shelby Davis: An Unknown, Great Value Investor

February 23, 2011

http://www.valuewalk.com A more up-to-date blog–highly recommended.

http://intelligentinvestors.org/blog.php (good blog with interesting reading links)

We can’t be Shelby Davis, but we can be inspired to push ourselves to become the best we can be as investors. Note his late start as an investor, those of you who are a few years out of school.  Another lesson: anyone can learn accounting but few realize the value of studying history like Davis.

In the pantheon of investing greats one of the least talked about, but most successful investors, is Shelby Davis. Starting at age 38, he took $50,000, provided by his wife Kathyrn, and amassed it into a $900 million fortune in 47 years (or 23.18% CAGR over 47 years!) This amounts to an annual compounded rate of return of over 23% during that time span. While his investing process can be summed up as growth-at-a-reasonable-price, he hardly wrote anything down as to not waste money on paper (he often wrote on the back of envelopes and scraps of paper which were tossed away). His extreme frugality helped him to save every penny he could to invest in “compounding machines,” as he called them. When he died he left his money in a charitable trust and left little to nothing for his two children; he was the epitome of a penny-pincher.

Shelby Davis received his bachelor’s in Russian history at Princeton (1930), his master’s degree at Columbia (1931), and his doctorate in political science at the University of Geneva (1934). Before starting his investment firm, Shelby Cullom Davis & Company in 1947, he worked odd jobs as a European correspondent with CBS in Geneva, as a “statistician” (before “stock analyst” was invented) for his brother-in-law’s Delaware fund, as a speechwriter and economic advisor for Thomas E. Dewey (then Governor of New York), a freelance writer, and author. He also worked for the War Production Board in Washington in 1942. A year prior to this he bought a seat on the New York Stock Exchange merely because it was cheap, having no use for it himself. He paid $33,000 for the seat which had fetched $625,000 in 1929. By the time Davis died in May of 1994 his seat was worth $830,000. His last job before he started his working on his investment portfolio was as First Deputy Superintendent of Insurance where he worked from 1944 to 1947.

Davis’ work analyzing insurance gave him an upper hand by the time he started his portfolio. He saw clear advantages in the insurance industry. Most insurers, he noticed, were selling well below book value. Dividends were large in this industry and if you bought an insurance company at market price you were basically getting the dividend stream for free. He also noticed that while life insurance policies were selling like hotcakes, policyholders weren’t dying. Insurance companies, he realized, were growth companies in disguise. Having studied Ben Graham’s writings Shelby knew of the power of buying these equities. Shelby bought out Frank Brokaw & Co., a street away from Wall Street, and turned it into Shelby Cullom Davis & Co. This is when his seat on the New York Stock Exchange started to show its use and he began to capitalize on that investment using it for his business.

Although he bought insurance stocks his portfolio acted like a modern-day tech portfolio, rising from $100,000 to $234,790 in one year (he always bought on margin). His biggest holding that year was Crum & Forster. By the early 1950’s Davis became a millionaire by sticking with insurance stocks. Insurance companies that had once traded at stodgy multiples (P/E’s of 3-4) and low earnings now traded at P/E’s of 15-20 with high earnings. Shelby called this the “Davis Double Play,” an initial boost from earnings and another from investors bidding up the multiple. He largely focused on fundamentals before choosing his investments, looking for a solid balance sheet and making sure the insurer did not hold risky assets like junk bonds. He then focused on the management quality and made trips to meet with management and drill them. Diversification was also one of his strategies as he believed you needed to own enough stocks so that the ones you were wrong on were compensated by the ones you were right on. Although he never gave a “magic number,” in the mid-1950’s he held up to 32 insurance companies.

After a trip to Japan in the mid 1960’s Davis was convinced that investing in Japanese insurance stocks was a winning bet. There were substantially far less insurers in Japan and many of these were selling at well below book value, sometimes even half of book value. He quickly snatched up American Insurance Underwriters (later acquired by AIG) and American Family (now AFLAC), both which had big dealings in Japan. He also added Tokio Marine & Fire, Sumitomo Marine & Fire, Taisho Marine & Fire, and Yasuda Marine & Fire to his holdings. Davis, after successfully investing in Japanese stocks, began buying stocks in Africa, Europe, the Far East, and Russia.

Like Buffett, Davis snapped up shares of GEICO when it was on the verge of failure. Davis even snapped up a large enough share to be placed on the board. Davis, enraged by a proposed stock sale plan by Buffett and David Byrne, eventually sold off all his shares and left the board, a decision he would live to regret. Shortly after, he increased his position in AIG but soon began straying from insurance holdings. Davis got ahold of Value Line during this time and used the analysis to his benefit. At this point his normal portfolio, usually 30-35 stocks, consisted of hundreds of holdings, often highly rated by Value Line, which he day-traded for small gains and actually profited in a flat market.

Although he deviated somewhat from insurance companies over his lifetime 11/12 most successful investments were still in that industry. These included AIG, the four Japanese companies above, Berkshire Hathaway, AON, Torchmark, Chubb, Capital Holdings, and Progressive. The odd man out was Fannie Mae. He had some other minor successes but the bulk of his portfolio was due to these 12. If anything can be learned from his investing it’s that holding a few big winners for a long time can go a long way.

Note: His son, also Shelby Davis, also went on to be a successful investor as well as his grandsons Chris and Andrew.

If you’d like to learn more about Shelby C. Davis’ life and investing style I urge you to read The Davis Dynasty by John Rothchild.

http://www.insuranceobserver.com/PDF/1994/060194.pdf   Grandfather Knows Best.

Family affair

01 Sep 2001 –

In the 1990s journalist John Rothchild co-authored three bestsellers with investing legend Peter Lynch.

By Rich Blake  September 2001     Institutional Investor Magazine

In his new book, The Davis Dynasty: 50 Years of Successful Investing on Wall Street, he takes on a less celebrated but no less successful subject, chronicling three generations of savvy stock pickers. It’s an intriguing tale that weaves in nearly a century of Wall Street history.

The well-researched, solidly written book focuses on the Davis clan: Shelby Cullom Davis, who died in 1994 at 85; his son, Shelby Davis, who in 1969 founded what would become the $40 billion mutual fund powerhouse Davis Selected Advisers; and his grandsons, Christopher and Andrew, who manage several of those funds today.

Patriarch Shelby Cullom Davis, who all but cornered the market in insurance stocks in the 1950s, began seriously investing at age 40 with a bankroll supplied by his wife. Over the course of four decades, his initial $50,000 stake grew into a $900 million fortune – a compound growth rate comparable to the one delivered by Warren Buffett, who also has an appetite for insurance stocks.

Born in 1909, Davis grew up in Peoria, Illinois, where his parents ran a corner store. His mother, Julia Cullom, traced her roots to the Mayflower. His father, George Davis, made a small fortune selling horse feed to Alaskan gold prospectors. After attending Princeton University, Davis in 1932 married Kathryn Wasserman, the daughter of a wealthy Philadelphia carpet mogul. He worked as a speechwriter and economic adviser for New York State governor Thomas Dewey, who appointed him to the post of deputy superintendent in the New York State Insurance Department. In 1947, with no MBA and no formal investment training, he quit his job to play the market full-time.

In those days most investors shunned insurance companies because of their heavy stakes in low-yielding bonds and mortgages. But Davis shrewdly recognized value in those assets. Between 1947 and 1949 the Dow Jones industrial average fell 24 percent, while Davis’s portfolio of seven insurance stocks more than quadrupled in value. By 1954 he had become a millionaire.

Davis frequently interrogated company managements. One of his favorite questions: “If you had one silver bullet to shoot a competitor, which competitor would you shoot?” A feared company must be doing something right, he reasoned. Rothchild writes of Davis, “He was a walking Rolodex of industry notables, an encyclopedia of actuarial trivia.”

Shelby Davis, born in 1937, “grew up on dinner-table stock talk and annual reports strewn around the house.” The elder Davis’s advice to his son: “You can always learn accounting on the side, but you’ve got to study history. History teaches that exceptional people make a difference.”

By age 25 Shelby was off to a quick start in his own investment career. In 1966 he left Bank of New York, where he worked as a stock analyst, to go into business with Guy Palmer, a fellow bank vice president. Jeremy Biggs, a portfolio manager for the U.S. Steel pension fund, joined them in 1968. (Biggs, the younger brother of Morgan Stanley strategist Barton Biggs, is now the chief investment officer at Fiduciary Trust Co.)

The group bought big stakes in technology names of the go-go ’60s. Most portfolios lost money in 1969; the partners’ New York Venture Fund, a large-cap value fund, gained 25.3 percent. The fund beat the market in all but six of the next 28 years. An original investment of $10,000 would have grown to $379,000.

Shelby’s self-made success pleased his father, who by the late 1950s had made it clear that his children would not be the beneficiaries of a large inheritance. In 1961 Davis squabbled with his daughter Diana over his plan to donate $3.8 million in her name to Princeton. Feeling cheated, she refused to sign the necessary papers and waged a public battle reported in the society pages of The New York Times.

Shelby, like his father, was determined not to spoil his children. “The most important thing I taught them about the investing business,” he recalls, “is how I loved being in it.”

It wasn’t long before the third generation got in the game. By the end of 1999, Christopher Davis’s New York Venture Fund had beaten the Standard & Poor’s 500 index for the sixth year in a row, and ranked near the top of Morningstar’s large-cap value category for five straight years. Venture gained 10 percent in 2000, while the S&P 500 lost 9 percent.

“We try not to be too positive about short-term success or too negative about short-term setbacks,” says Christopher Davis. It’s a sensible approach that has served the clan well.

CASE STUDY on Xerox (XRX)

There is, finally, the supremely important problem of combating general fluctuations of economic activity and the recurrent waves of large-scale unemployment which accompany them.  This is, of course, one of the gravest and most pressing problems of our time.  But, though its solution will require much planning in the good sense, it does not — or at least need not — require that special kind of planning which according to its advocates is to replace the market.  Many economists hope, indeed, that the ultimate remedy may be found in the field of monetary policy, which would involve nothing incompatible even with nineteenth-century liberalism.  Others, it is true, believe that real success can be expected only from the skillful timing of public works undertaken on a very large-scale.  This might lead to much more serious restrictions of the competitive sphere, and, in experimenting in this direction, we shall have to carefully watch our step if we are to avoid making all economic activity progressively more dependent on the direction and volume of government expenditure. But his is neither the only nor, in my opinion, the most promising way of meeting the gravest threat to economic security.  In any case, the very necessary effort to secure protection against these fluctuations do not lead to the kind of planning which constitutes such a threat to our freedom.–Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom, pp.121-22.

CASE STUDY

Your boss drops XRX’s 10K, www.yousendit.com/download/M3BscHBNTkxTRTdyZHNUQw on your desk. Then he asks, Should we sell out of this position since the company’s market cap is about $11 to $12 billion with $9 billion of debt and an underfunded Pension Fund?

Is this company dangerously over leveraged? Yes or no and why? Please reply in 20 minutes or less. If you feel you can’t adequately answer, then what would you need to find out? State your reply in no more than a sentence or two.

Value-Line Tear Sheet on Xerox for Reference:
http://www.yousendit.com/download/M3BscHBNTkxPSHo0WjhUQw

Prize to be determined.

Long-Term Bonds

The cure (low interest rates) IS the disease: http://mises.org/daily/5164

If you own long-term government bonds then the question you have to ask yourself is……………………..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0-oinyjsk0

Housekeeping

I will post the analysis of Coke/Pepsi Case Study this weekend. And we have one final installment on ROIC before burying that dead horse.

Have a good weekend!

Interesting Videos and Readings

You make money on wall street by being very selective and being patient, waiting for those opportunities that are irresistible, where the percentages are very heavily in your favor.- Seth Glickenhaus

A Nose Job

Have we lost our sense of humor? A surgeon may lose his license over a commercial.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/14/jewish-nose-docs-jewcan-sam-video-investigated_n_1345825.html

Rock Video: I will love you forever if you just got your nose done: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkzTcUVTP0Q

Economics

Is Inflation about General Price Increases?  http://mises.org/daily/5953/Is-Inflation-about-General-Increases-in-Prices

The Theory of Central Banking: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HAEPSt_12U. A good lecture by Robert Murphy on how central banking works.

Banking, Central Banking and the Economic Crisis by De Soto (excellent): http://www.goldmoney.com/video/huerta-de-soto-presentation.html. De Soto’s accent is heavy but he gives you a good historical perspective on fractional reserve banking.

Prison Nation going broke:http://bastiat.mises.org/2012/03/prison-nation-going-broke

Keep Track of your Investing

How To Start Keeping A Journal

http://www.kirkreport.com/2012/01/27/wisdom-from-jason-zweig/

The blog above is focused on trading, but the lessons apply as much to value investors. Substitute investing for the word, trading. In fact, what excuse do you have for not keeping a journal?

Make things happen

http://www.tomwoods.com/blog/the-internet-makes-things-happen-if-you-use-it/

Dollar Shave Club: http://www.dollarshaveclub.com/select-blade

Case Study on Capital Expenditures (MCX)

Here’s to our wives and girlfriends… may they never meet! –Groucho Marx

MCX and Iridium Case Study

Our first discussion of Maintenance Capital Expenditures (“MCX”) occurred here: http://wp.me/p1PgpH-6t

One method of learning is to EXHAUSTIVELY analyze and read about a subject so we can master the topic and understand the principles and subtleties in applying those principles.

We are focused on Return on Invested Capital which has been defined one way as Operating Earnings (Earnings before Interest Expense and Taxes, EBIT) or better yet, (Earnings before Interest Expense, Taxes and Depreciation & Amortization, “EBITDA” – MCX) divided by tangible capital or (Net Working Capital + Net Property, Plant and Equipment). We have covered EBITDA thoroughly in a 36 page discussion here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/66843869/Placing-EBITDA-Into-Perspective.

Now we review MCX as part of the (EBITDA – MCX) calculation.

The link below has a PDF that further analyzes how to calculate one aspect of Return on Invested Capital–(EBITDA – MCX) divided by Tangible Capital.

c7efc68c4c646b874f87a58d1cb63dc5
Also, this case study will be placed in the VALUE VAULT

The Bridge of Death

If you do not master the above case study then as investors you will not be able to cross the Bridge of Death:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7iXw9zZrLo&feature=related

Cubanos – Life and Death of a Revolution

Video: http://vimeo.com/36349666

This short documentary by a Cuban musician captures what life is like for the typical Cuban.  Life in a centrally controlled tyranny. The sentence for selling meat is five years imprisonment.

Cubanos, a completely independent production, liberates itself from television convention to draw an impressionist portrait of the Cuban community. Sincere interviews and sequence shots reveal an identity fragmented by more than 50 years of dictatorship, a people struggling to leave the 20th century behind. While music may barely camouflage the misery and corruption in Cuba, the sounds of engines and commercial radio can’t mask the cultural gap between the island and the very active community in Miami.

The main character, Catuey, a Cuban musician who has been living in Québec for a number of years, brings to his journey and his songs the image of an ideal Cuba hurt by the division in its people and the group-think that prevails in Miami. Confronted with the contradictions among his countrymen and his own demons, Catuey ends his odyssey drained and disappointed not to have found a simple path to reconciliation. The film steers clear of the pitfalls of sensationalist news, taking a more holistic approach to the identity issues the Cuban community will face upon the death of Fidel Castro.


SNPK Follow-up on Toxic “Death Spiral Convert” Convertible

It is a fraud to borrow what we are unable to pay.–Publilius Syrus

SNPK Discussion

Yesterday I posted the case study and quiz question here: http://wp.me/p1PgpH-z5 and financial information was posted here: SNPK’s Financials: http://www.scribd.com/doc/85185922/SNPK-Financials

Readers are too astute to be asked whether a company like SNPK is worthy of their time as a potential investment. The company is an obvious promotion.

However, while taking 30 seconds–not a second more–to scan the financials, I saw a debt instrument that I thought had been banned back in the 1990s–a toxic convertible on pages 6 and 7 of the 100+ pages PDF on SNPK. There it was lurking quietly.

If you see a company like SNPK that is cash flow negative, you know to focus on the sources of financing because, without outside funding, this “firm” is defunct.  The amount of debt and the terms are what you immediately focus on.  Several readers pointed out all the other horrors like insider control, other debt, Panamanian shareholder, Nevada corporation, and who might the CEO be since this is a one-man show (a former broker at FBR). The company has no competitive advantages and about $95,000 in assets (not including liabilities).  The convertible note and other debt is what is funding this “company.”

Prize Awarded to all contestants

Anyone who answered will receive an email prize from me this afternoon. Good effort.

Since the wording of my test question may have been poor, I have taken on a new job in penance:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF-CkMpQtlY&feature=related as a Village Idiot.

….OK, back to SNPK

The firm was created as a reverse merger into a shell company:

Through a Share Exchange Agreement

Control

On February 13, 2012, Sunpeaks Ventures, Inc., a Nevada corporation  entered into that certain Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with Healthcare Distribution Specialists LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (“HDS”), Mackie Barch, the managing member of HDS, who presently owns 100% of the issued and outstanding membership interests in HDS, and Scott Beaudette, the majority shareholder of the Company. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Share Exchange Agreement, HDS shall exchange 100% of the outstanding membership interests in HDS in exchange for: (i) two hundred million (200,000,000) newly-issued restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share and (ii) three million (3,000,000) newly-issued restricted shares of the Company’s Class A Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share. The exchange will result in HDS becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Paid-off and Private Market Value

Additionally, pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, Mr. Beaudette shall cancel two hundred million (200,000,000) shares of the Company’s common stock that he currently owns (He was paid on his $5,000 loan to the company–so we have a private market transaction giving a $5,000 worth to the 200 million shares). Perhaps current market value of $100 million plus might be unsustainable?

As you scanned for notes to all the debt outstanding you found: Toxic Convertible on pages 6 and 7.

ITEM 02 UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY   SECURITIES.

On March 1, 2012, Sunpeaks Ventures, Inc. (“we” or the “Company”) issued a 10% convertible note in with an original principal amount of $200,000 (the “Note”) to an investor. The Note provides for an interest rate of ten percent (10%) and matures on March 1, 2014. The Note is convertible into shares of our common stock, par value $0.001, based on a conversion price that is equal to a twenty percent (20%) discount to the average market price over a ten (10) day period immediately prior to the conversion date.

The issuance of the Note was offered and sold in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The convertible note is being “secured” by the stock market fantasy currently being perpetuated on gullible “investors” and/or stock traders. Who is buying during those 100 million share trading days? If you are unclear why the above is so toxic, then read the document provided in the link below.

Toxic Convertible (“death Spiral Converts”)

Used by companies that are in such bad shape, that there is no other way to get financing. This instrument is similar to a convertible bond, but convertible at a discount to the share price at issuance and for a fixed dollar amount rather than a specific number of shares. The further the stock falls, the more shares you get. Popular in the mid to late 1990s. Also known as death spiral convertibles or floorless convertibles.

Death Spiral

A loan that investors give to a publicly-traded company in exchange for convertible bonds. The convertible bonds give the investor a right to buy shares in the company at a low, agreed-upon price. However, issuing these bonds creates more shares outstanding when they are converted, which results in a drop in the share price. The low share price encourages more bondholders to convert their bonds to equity, which causes a further drop in price and the process continues. Because of this disadvantage, companies only engage in death spirals if they badly need cash.

Below is a definitive report on the horror of Toxic Convertibles (34 pages)http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/54/54.1/Nayini.pdf

Of course, you would have noticed another loan, an unsecured promissory note. But the $200,000 (more than twice the reported assets of the “firm”) was all you needed to know. The shareholders will be left holding the bag. This is a $0 in a year or two.

Let’s clean off the slime and grime and return to work.

Case Study, Test, and Prize on SPNK–A Fantasy, Scam, or Fraud? Cheer Up and Look on the Bright Side of Life!

If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.–Steven Wright

SPNK: Can you Find the ticking bomb?

Anyone who specifically points out in the documents (see link below) where there is guaranteed devastation for the common shareholders will receive an A+ and an email prize.

If someone has posted a reply in the comments section, try not to read it, and think through the case on your own. Why are we in the world of Penny stocks, pump and dump stock schemes and Mafia-controlled companies–far, far away from our cherished franchises like IBM. Colgate, and Stryker?  Sometimes if you invert, you can learn more about financial statements and human nature.

Skim through the 115 pages and focus on the critical areas. Tomorrow evening I will post my analysis of this document.  The goal is to get you to pick out the danger areas. Obviously, this company has little financial value based on its assets and operations, but what is particularly lethal to any shareholder?

Good luck!

SNPK’s Financials:http://www.scribd.com/doc/85185922/SNPK-Financials

Guess how stocks like SNPK are sold:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zakyg3thfY

http://www.pennystockresearch.com/nsrs-csoc-pump-and-dump-alerts-february-1-2012/

I just received an email alert:

Dear valued subscribers,

SNPK closed at 70 cents today. Getting one step closer to multi dollar territories. We are absolutely confident of the massive potential this pick holds.

If it can just reproduce a fraction of the gains our last pick experienced it would still hit multi dollar levels.

Tomorrow may be one of the last opportunities our members will have to buy SNPK under a dollar.

The company announced this morning that its product, Clotamin, will be sold in about 70 different Discount Drug Mart locations around Ohio. This is on top of the product being available in 9 different states already, and being just picked up by Dakota Drug Inc. for distribution.

Those of you who did buy SNPK a few days ago and are holding are already up a lot.

Those of you who didn’t buy it yet are definitely considering to place an order first thing in the morning.

Do you remember how much our last pick soared? If you had just put $1,000 at our initial alert and and liquidated into near multi dollar levels you could’ve pulled more than $20,000 within 2 months. Not a bad ROI when the S&P returns around 8% a year on avg.

If you invest in anything with 8% return such as the S&P that same $1,000 will take you 40 years to turn into $20,000. As we just mentioned our last pick could have potentially created 40 years’ value in just weeks. Then you could possibly do it all over again with our next pick after it (which in this case is SNPK).

It is already up almost double since our initial alert 4 short days ago. That same gain would take 9 years to produce with the S&P.

The company is in negotiations with a major NBA star to support their products. Let’s stay tuned as this is important information!

SNPK has been steadily climbing every day! Our members couldn’t be happier!

http://www.zdnetasia.com/stock-pump-and-dump-spam-makes-comeback-62301948.htm

Stock pump-and-dump spam makes comeback

                By , ZDNet Asia on September 6, 2011News of the global debt crisis is driving pump-and-dump stock scams in volatile markets, enabling spammers to make profits by artificially “pumping” up stock prices so as to sell cheaply purchased stocks, note a new report by Symantec.Released Monday, the Symantec August 2011 Intelligence Reportrevealed that spammers are seeking to reap from fluctuations in the turbulent financial markets, by sending large amounts of spam related to certain “pink sheets” stocks, in an attempt to “pump” the value of these stocks before “dumping” them at a profit.”Pink sheets” are typically over-the-counter stocks of companies that are not required to submit financial statements to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.”With the world still reeling from the recession, the stock markets are now in turmoil from the increasingly global credit crisis and the specter of a ‘double dip recession’, whereby the [world] economy is expected to again tank after a brief rally,” said Samir Patil, a security researcher at Symantec, in a blog post.According to Paul Wood, senior intelligence analyst at Symantec’s cloud business, scammers can make “substantial profits in a matter of days” with well-executed pump-and-dump spam campaigns. “In the current turbulent environment, many people may be convinced to invest in stocks that scammers claim will benefit from the market turbulence,” he pointed out in a statement.

In a typical pump-and-dump stock scam, spammers promote certain stocks to inflate the price as much as possible so they may then be sold before their valuation crashes back to reality, said Symantec. The spam for these scams tries to convince the prospective investor that the cheap or penny stock is actually worth more than its valuation, or that it will soon skyrocket.

However, most of these claims are misleading or false, the vendor warned in its report.

In a successful campaign, the influx of spam will artificially drive the stock’s price to a point where scammers decide to sell their shares. This usually coincides with them ending the spam campaign, which could reduce interest in the stock, helping to drive the valuation back to its original low price, which could also be exploited in the market.

Most of the pump-and-dump spam originate from the United States and China, while a percentage is being generated from other countries in Asia. The majority of the attacks target North American users, Symantec revealed.

The report also noted a deluge of penny stock spam promoting Resource Exchange of America Corp (RXAC.PK) stocks whereby messages were full of irrelevant line breaks and spaces between words.

The e-mail headers contained broken words such as “Stocks” and “money” with poorly translated non sequiturs throughout the message such as “United States still an AAA country, Obama says?!”.

Other examples of e-mail subjects include “Stocks Ready to Bounce?”, “There is a MASSIVE PROMOTION underway NOW!” and “Been right on the money”.

In order to avoid falling prey to e-mail scams such as pump-and-dump scams, users should create a spam filter, never respond to spam and get multiple e-mail addresses for multiple purposes, Stephanie Boo, regional director for Symantec’s cloud business, advised.

“The Internet world is a borderless one. Today’s volume and sophistication of threat activities have increased substantially and cybercriminals continue to be motivated by financial gains,” she said in an e-mail. “Pump-and-dump scams are just one of the many tactics that cybercriminals leverage to attack consumers and enterprises alike.”

Cheer up and look at the bright side of life

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2Wx230gYJw&feature=related

Where Do YOU Fit? Visit at the Bunny Ranch

“He knows nothing; he thinks he knows everything – that clearly points to a political career–George Bernard Shaw

Not in the right fit? know your aptitudes?

There is a private research institute, Johnson O’Conner Research Foundation, that studies human aptitudes. An interesting article here:  http://www.profutures.com/article.php/746/

Podcast on Johnson O’Conner Aptitude Testing: http://www.insidepersonalgrowth.com/2010/10/podcasts/podcast-234-johnson-oconner-research-foundation-with-anne-steiner/

A Book on Your Natural Gifts: http://www.amazon.com/Your-Natural-Gifts-Recognize-Self-Fulfillment/dp/0939009560/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1331574008&sr=8-1

Just remember–aptitudes are natural gifts (you may even take them for granted) versus interests. I may want to be an accountant but my low aptitude for graphoria (working quickly and accurately with pen, paper and numbers) will make me less likely to be happy or to succeed at the profession.

Articles of Interest

Stock Market Warnings? http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc120312.htm

More on the Hussman Funds: http://www.hussmanfunds.com/index.html

When Did the Constitution Cease to Mean Anything: http://brontecapital.blogspot.com/2012/03/when-did-us-constitution-cease-to.html

John Stossel on legalizing prostitution: http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/107425.html

So, money is legal in America; sex is legal in America; ergo, sex for money is illegal. Logic?

EBITDA leading to EBIT and then to ROIC; Accounting blogs

We literally called Jon Corzine. We called Jon Corzine because we knew that he knew about the economy, about the world markets, about how we had to respond.” –Vice President Joe Biden, talking about the people he asked for advice from during the financial crisis.

Jon Corzine recently resigned as the CEO of MF Global. The firm declared bankruptcy after making bad bets on European Sovereign debt.
The bankruptcy was the fourth-largest financial firm in U.S. history, and the eighth largest overall.

EBITDA into Perspective

We will finish our discussion on return on invested capital (ROIC) this week, but first let’s return to fundamentals. Joel Greenblatt uses (EBITDA minus maintenance capital expenditures (“MCX”) as his proxy for Operating Earnings or EBIT.

Many may have not seen the 36-page PDF on placing EBITDA into context*. Once we know MCX, we can subtract that estimated figure from EBITDA to arrive at pre-tax operating income–the bedrock upon which we divide by the amount of capital used to produce such income for calculating ROIC.

We will discuss MCX in another post.

EBITDA mentioned here: http://csinvesting.org/placing-ev-and-ebitda-into-perspective-case-studies/

*Placing EBITDA into perspective (36-page PDF): http://www.scribd.com/doc/66843869/Placing-EBITDA-Into-Perspective

Recent blog discussion on EBITDA: http://blogs.smeal.psu.edu/grumpyoldaccountants/archives/542

Educational Blogs on Accounting and Financial Statement Analysis

http://mgt.gatech.edu/news_room/news/2009/articles/FALreporttaxpayments.html

http://www.10qdetective.blogspot.com/

http://accountingonion.typepad.com/

http://www.footnoted.com/

http://www.footnoted.com/

http://www.thebigdo-over.com/

http://www.proxydemocracy.org/

http://sharesleuth.com/

http://blog.issgovernance.com/

James Grant Opines on the Unintended Consequences of the FED and ECB’s Interventions

Investors refuse to believe that shock lies in wait…Investors do better where risk management is a conscious part of the process…survival is the only road to riches. Let me say that again: survival is the only road to riches. You should try to maximize return only if losses would not threaten your survival…You don’t want to blow it, because you don’t get a second chance. When you invest, it’s not your wealth today, but it’s your future that you’re really managing. – Peter Bernstein

Hospitalized for a serious condition: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbS2WJdav6c&feature=fvsr  Pray that I can be cured……… 

James Grant Discusses the Folly of Fed Policy

James Grant Interview on CNBC March 07, 2012

http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000077329&utm

Transcript:

CNBC Money Honey:The Federal Reserve is reportedly considering a new bond buying program to bolster the economy. The Wall Street Journal said the plan would buy more mortgage or treasury bonds, but borrow it back for short periods at lower rates. My next guest says such a plan would do more harm than good. James Grant from Grant’s Interest Rate Observer (www.grantspub.com) and Kelly Evans from headquarters are with me today. Good to see you, Jim. thank you so much for joining us.James Grant: Good to see you.

CNBC: You say such a plan by the Feds would be a wrong approach.

James Grant: We’ve had the easy money now for several years. What do you think the implications of it is? we should call this what it is, it is market manipulation, that’s what we call it in the private sector. What the Fed is doing is manhandling the structure of interest rates to the end of achieving of what it takes to be desirable macro outcomes. If the government would go down to the farmer’s market at 14th street and fiddle with the scales, there would be an understandable outcry from the customers. But the Fed and Central Banks the world over are in unprecedented ways of manipulating the value of what they’re printing, by a ton. In the latest gambit, the Fed wants to manipulate long-term interest rates lower. But in so doing, it is manipulating perceptions of risk, and it is creating a real inflation in the sense that people who want to retire in their savings, need much more cash to do it.

CNBC: And I like your latest cartoon, stick ’em up, this is a debt swap. Yeah. in the latest grant interest rate observer, in terms of the inflationary story, we’ve been talking about the threat of inflation after a long time with this easy money.

James Grant: I want to get into the ECB (European Central Bank) as well, because it’s not just the Fed. have we seen inflation yet? there’s inflation certainly in spots–obviously commodity inflation. But there’s also inflation, I think, in market assets that are stimulated, to use that favorite word of the authorities, stimulated by ultra-low interest rates. For example, in the distressed debt markets, you’ll find companies that have not made a profit in five years, issuing debt, as if this company were somehow   soundly and demonstrably solvent. by pressing down interest rates, by repressing interest rates, the Fed is in effect dulling the risk sensors of   the entire marketplace. Is this good? it’s the question to ask, Kelly. And the reason so many people are focused on the drawback of these record low interest rates and the fact that it’s also punishing savers.

CNBC: I’m curious, it may not amount to anything, but Jim, if the Fed goes this route of sterilizing its quantitative easing, and if they do another round, what does that mean to you?

James Grant: Why would they pursue that kind of action–lend long, in other words, which is in the private sector, a great way to go broke, as a bank. The Fed is going to do this. It thinks — the Wall Street Journal is floating this balloon. The Fed doesn’t want to have us believe that it is recklessly printing money to do that, ergo the gambit of locking up the funds with which this buys the bonds.

CNBC: Kelly, it looks like nothing more than what we’ve seen.  It’s the Fed interposing itself between the marketplace and — Jim, it’s an overture to people like you who think the Feds are creating inflation. Do you read a message like that and feel comforted somehow that —

James Grant, “No, I am distinctly uncomforted, Kelly. The Fed is creating, if not inflation, it is creating distortions. What has the Fed got against the price mechanism? it’s got in this country a long way over 200 years, suddenly, wherever the market sells off, we somehow have to have a fed interjection of money. What about the ECB? We’ve got the European Central Bank allowing a three-year period where the banks can pay back the lending. What are they doing with that money? They’re actually buying sovereign debt longer term. What about the ECB action? The ECB is going through a kind of adolescent growth spurt. Its balance sheet is positively exploding. its balance sheet is the equivalent of $4 trillion. It’s one-third larger than the Fed’s. Although the Euro zone has an economy about 13% or 15% smaller than ours. The Fed is a piker compared to what the  ECB has recently been doing. I think the point is, the world over we’re seeing unprecedented things (the beginning of the end of fiat currencies). We’re seeing interest rates that are lower than ever, and central banks that have never been more recklessly pro creative, to use Warren Buffett’s words, about assets. They’re printing money like mad. And people can’t seem to get enough long-term bonds, because the central banks are manipulating expectations about the future of interest rates. I think it’s all very dangerous. We can draw lessons from the depression of the 1920s, but what are the actual consequences of this continued government intervention?

Can we talk about what happened in early 1920s? Ben Bernanke can’t stop talking about the ’30s. But in 1920, ’21, the economy fell off the cliff. Nominal GDP was down 29%, wholesale prices collapsed by 40%. you know how the Fed and the Treasury reacted to this, the Treasury balanced the budget and the Fed actually raised interest rates. Guess what, the depression ended.

See video on the 1920/21 Depression by Tom Woods: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czcUmnsprQI

Amity Shales on the Great Depression:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLeAqbOUt4c. A video destroying the common beliefs of what caused the Great Depression. The Forgotten Man.

James Grant: We keep on hearing this propaganda stick drum beat assertion that in order to get us out of our sorrows, the authorities, the high and mighty ones, say we must run immense deficits.

Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution gives the Congress the power to COIN money and FIX the standard of WEIGHTS and MEASURES. The Constitution was not intended to give government (the Fed) the power to constantly change the yardstick of money (changing the quantity of money).  Also, the Fed interferes with the traffic signals of the economy–interest rates–by keeping the traffic light at green constantly. This will only lead to more mal-investment.