Currency Wars

images

And when the money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in they presence? For the money faileth.” –Genesis 47:15 King James Version

We’re in the midst of an international currency war.” Guido Mantega, Finance Minister of Brazil, Sept. 27, 2010

I don’t like the expression….currency war.” Dominque Strauss-Kahn, Managing Director, IMF, November 18, 2010

Before you sell your stocks, buy gold, and huddle in the basement with your canned food and ammo cans, none of what you read below is inevitable. I post this to make you aware of what is going on and to encourage you to learn about money and credit. Turn off your TV and read.  We may be entering the end of one monetary regime and the beginning of another, though the process may take several years.

The Theory of Money and Credit_Mises plus the STUDY GUIDE to_Money and Credit,   Course Outline by Robert Murphy  and   Mises on Money_Vol_3 by Gary North  and  2012 1Q Mises on Money and Banking Lecture 1 (If enough readers are interested I can put up a folder with audio lectures and notes of each chapter of Mises’ monumental work, The Theory of Money and Credit).  Yes, the book will take careful, multiple readings to fully grasp, but you will have a greater understanding of money and credit than 99.99999% of anyone on Wall Street or Washington, then you can place the world around you in context.

Note that the period from 1971, when President Nixon severed the last anchor to gold, to today is an unusual period in monetary history. Compare these 43 years to the thousands of years where money had some linkage to an object(s) of intrinsic value like gold, copper, or silver. Listen to Nixon’s excuses for his actions–blame the “international speculators” instead of his government’s wildly inflationary policies.

The Book, Currency Wars, The Making of the Next Global Crisis is one that I recommend. See more: http://www.currencywarsbook.com/

The cause of currency wars: http://www.peakprosperity.com/blog/james-rickards-paper-gold-or-chaos/71504

A simulated currency war

Not to give away the conclusion, but if we linked the dollar to gold then this might happen: Gold Fair Value

An explanation here:  The Gold Money Index and gold

Our Current Situation (March 2013) James Rickards:

rickards-02242013 and more scenarios: http://youtu.be/4gx4osDMfGw

What does this have to do with today? Warning bells are ringing: Cypriot_Bailout_Sends_Shivers_Throughout_the_Euro_Zone. On the one hand, people should be aware of how banks are inherently bankrupt under today’s current fractional reserve banking system and loss of their savings would teach a lesson. However, to simply change the rules of the game with a sudden theft by bureaucrats devastates savers who may have had nothing to do with the crisis and are the ones whose savings are crucial for the economy. If you think U.S. is different from Cyprus, it’s not. $400B per year goes from depositors to banks via the Fed zero rate policy. See how the Fed devastates poor savers and those on fixed incomes (an important read): Senate-Testimony-Hearing-Rickards-03-28-12

Wake up! SYDNEY (MarketWatch) — Asia stocks reacted badly on Monday March 18th to details of a bailout of Cyprus over the weekend — with U.S. stock-index futures and the euro also sharply lower — as investors fretted about the potential implications of a decision to levy private bank deposits.

The Euro Has Brought Central Planning and Destruction

The Euro has succeeded in serving as a vehicle for centralization in Europe and for the French government’s goal of establishing a European Empire under its control—curbing the influence of the German state. Monetary policy was the political means toward political union. Proponents of a socialist Europe saw the Euro as their trump against the defense of a classical liberal Europe that had been expanding in power and influence ever since the Berlin Wall came down. The single currency was seen as a step toward political integration and centralization. The logic of interventions propelled the Euro system toward a political unification under a central state in Brussels. As national states are abolished, the market place of Europe becomes a new Soviet Union.

Read: The Tragedy of the Euro

A Way Out?

Murray Rothbard, the great American Austrian monetary historian and economist suggested: 100_percent Gold Back Dollar Rothbard

The problem of moving to a gold-backed dollar: http://mises.org/daily/5492

Ben Graham knew no country engaged in a currency war ever benefited. His solution, a dollar backed by a basket of commodities:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-28/benjamin-graham-s-clever-idea-for-averting-currency-wars.html

You have about six months of reading if you spend 40 minutes each day tackling the various subjects.  Good luck!

—-

PS: The ext post I will answer readers’ questions and post a valuation study for beginners.

Claim Your Prize, Marks on the Equity Risk Premium

Great Fence

The Thai Stock Market (ETF) on fire up 500% in four years (moving to a mania?)

Thailand

For those who worked on our moral dilemma (See http://wp.me/p2OaYY-1Lr) please claim your prize. https://www.yousendit.com/download/UVJpZEU4R3NCTWtPd3NUQw

I hope the prize encourages you to study other asset classes and markets outside the U.S. even if you never invest outside America.  At least you will be aware of global forces and opportunities/threats. If you hear the world economy is becoming stronger, look at the baltic freight index and copper futures instead.

Howard Marks on the Equity Risk Premium

Many of the important things about investing are counterintuitive. Low-quality assets can be safer than high-quality assets. Things get riskier as they become more highly respected (and thus appreciate). There can be more risk in thinking you know something than in accepting that you don‟t. This counter-intuitiveness is a favorite theme of mine.

To me, the answer is simple: the better returns have been, the less likely they are – all other things being equal – to be good in the future. Generally speaking, I view an asset as having a certain quantum of return potential over its lifetime. The foundation for its return comes from its ability to produce cash flow. To that base number we should add further return potential if the asset is undervalued and thus can be expected to appreciate to fair value, and we should reduce our view of its return potential if it is overvalued and thus can be expected to decline to fair value.

So – again all other things being equal – when the yearly return on an asset exceeds the rate at which it produces cash flow (or at which the cash flow grows), the excess of the appreciation over that associated with its cash flow should be viewed as either reducing the amount of its undervaluation (and thus reducing the expectable appreciation) or increasing its overvaluation (and thus increasing the price decline which is likely). The simplest example is a 5% bond. Let‟s say a 5% bond at a given price below par has a 7% expected return (or yield to maturity) over its remaining life. If the bond returns 15% in the next twelve months, the expected return over its then-remaining life will be less than 7%. An above-trend year has borrowed from the remaining potential. The math is simplest with bonds (as always), but the principle is the same if you own stocks, companies or income-producing real estate.

But the study of market history only makes us better investors if it teaches us how to assess conditions as they are, rather than in retrospect.

Marks on Equity Risk Premium March 2013

Doug Casey on Not Hiring MBAs

http://www.kitco.com/news/video/show/on-the-spot/55/2012-10-25/There-Will-Be-Panic-Into-Gold-Casey-Research   (see 4 minute 30 second mark)

Interviewer: Do they need a good degree to work at your shop? (www.caseyresearch.com)?

Doug Casey, “We don’t care if someone has an MBA or college. We don’t care whether they went to college. We ask, “Do they have good character, intelligence, diligence, are they hard working and do they want to improve themselves. I don’t see how a college degree has anything to do with that, especially what they are teaching today—gender studies, etc. If someone comes to work for us today with an MBA, we look at them and say, What’s going on in your head that you allocated $100,000 and two years of your life to get more theory instead of doing in the real world.

The Banana Dow

DOW

Yeah, another RECORD high in the Dow. Can you hear the cheers? But what can the Dow buy you in Bananas vs. the past? What is the real Dow in Bananas1

bananas-vs-dow

Based on the wholesale price of bananas, the Dow currently buys you a whopping 15.35 tons of the tropical fruit. But this is exactly the same amount of bananas the Dow would buy back in February 2008, when the Dow was just 12,266. And it’s a massive 60% drop from June 1999 when the Dow bought 38.51 tons of bananas.  While investors are cheering the new nominal high in the Dow or S&P 500, they fail to grasp what is happening to their purchasing power. Buffett always said THE goal of an investor is to maintain his or her purchasing power. At the end of your investing period will the dollars obtained after selling your investment bring you the same amount of “bananas” as your dollars would have obtained at the beginning of your investment period.

Bear Market Dow in Gasoline

gasoline-vs-dow

Read more: http://www.sovereignman.com/finance/reality-check-the-dow-jones-industrial-average-vs-bananas-11112/

All investors should understand the effects of inflation on their equity investments. Read, memorize, and sleep with the following:

Buffett & Inflation Highlighted and Buffett inflation file and for beginners: Buffett Inflation depreciation and capex

Buffett Lecturing on Inflation

Don’t believe the lies:

shadow-stats-alternative-inflation-data-as-of-nov-15-2012-source-shadowstatscom

CPI Year-to-Year Growth

The CPI-U (consumer price index) is the broadest measure of consumer price inflation for goods and services published by the U.S. Government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

While the headline number usually is the seasonally-adjusted month-to-month change, the formal CPI is reported on a not-seasonally-adjusted basis, with annual inflation measured in terms of year-to-year percent change in the price index.

The chart below shows the Shadow Government Stats -Alternate CPI estimate. It figures inflation based on our own government’s official methodology for computing the CPI-U in the years through 1980.

Under the old rules US inflation has been in the double-digits for much of the preceding five years. The ‘new’ BLS numbers want you to believe price increases since 2008 have been quite mild.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics also uses a technique called ‘substitution’ to hold down their reported inflation figures. If an item in their index goes up in price they can assume consumer would simply trade down to something cheaper instead.

If your favorite rib-eye steak went from $7.99 to $12.99 per pound you’d simply eat hamburger instead. Have those organic bananas gotten too expensive. Try prunes. Need a replacement for your Lexus? Buy a Kia instead. Presto, there’s no inflation evident in any of those situations according to the BLS.

All these changes in the way CPI is calculated have been duly disclosed to the public. That doesn’t make them any less dishonest when viewed the way most people gauge changes in their real cost of living.  See http://www.beatingbuffett.com/?tag=inflation

http://www.beatingbuffett.com/?p=4436   Individual investors making poor decisions.

http://marketshadows.com/2012/12/31/covered-calls-the-hidden-risk-for-2013-and-beyond/ The danger of selling covered calls now.

More discussion about Buffett and inflation here: http://www.cornerofberkshireandfairfax.ca/forum/general-discussion/buffett-on-inflation-and-stocks-%28part-1%29/40/

You’re warned! Now plan.

“Answer” for the Moral Dilemma; Starting as an Investment Banker

First remote

 

In an economic system, if the goal of the authorities is to reduce some particular risks, then the sum of all these suppressed risks will reappear one day through a massive increase in the systemic risk and this will happen because the future is unknowable.” –Karl Popper

Moral Dilemma

…was mentioned in the last post here: http://wp.me/p2OaYY-1Lf

Most people might choose to divert the course of the train, and sacrifice only one child. You might think the same way to save most of the children at the expense of only one child. Many would think that would be the rational decision to make both emotionally and morally.  But, have you ever thought that the child choosing to play on the disused track had in fact made the right decision to play at a safe place?

Nevertheless, he had to be sacrificed because of his ignorant friends who chose to play where the danger was. This kind of dilemma happens around us every day. In the office, community, in politics and especially in a democratic society, the minority is often sacrificed for the interest of the majority, no matter how foolish or ignorant the majority are, and how farsighted and knowledgeable the minority are.  Just look at our recent financial crisis where savers are punished with suppressed interest rates in order to bail out imprudent  bankers or over-indebted governments–welcome to crony capitalism and the entitlement state.

The great critic Leo Velski Julian as well as Sorav who told the story said he would not try to change the course of the train because he believed that the kids playing on the operational track should have known very well that track was still in use, and that they should have run away if they heard the train’s sirens. If the train was diverted, that lone child would definitely die because he never thought the train could come over to that track!

Moreover, that track was not in use probably because it was not safe. If the train was diverted to the track, we could put the lives of all passengers on board at stake! and in your attempt to save a few kids by sacrificing one child, you might end up sacrificing hundreds of people to save these few kids. (Sounds like the U.S.’s centrally-controlled bail-out financial system)

See this recent example: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/13/usda-big-sugar-bailout_n_2866535.html

‘Remember that what’s right isn’t always popular…and what’s popular isn’t always right.’

Reader’s Question

A reader asks what books to read to help him prepare for his summer internship as an investment banker.

First, don’t lose your humanity. Second, read the suggested books below. My best recommendations are at the top, then work down the list.

The First Junk Bond: A Story of Corporate Boom and Bust by Harlan D. Platt. The BEST book on a corporate finance through case studies.  This is a detailed case study. Platt integrates corporate history, industry fundamental, financial analysis and bankruptcy law on a scale that has rarely, if ever, been attempted–book jacket.

Sense & Nonsense in Corporate Finance: An Antidote to Conventional Thinking About LBOs, Capital Budgeting, Dividend Policy, and Creating Shareholder Value by Louis Lowenstein

The New Financial Capitalist: Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and the Creation of Corporate Value by George P. Baker and George David Smith. This is sort of a text book explanation for Barbarians at the Gate

Barbarians at the Gate by Burrough and Helyerthe hostile takeover of RJR Nabisco. Great drama and Corp. Fin. History.

It Didn’t Have to be This Way: Why Boom and Bust is Unnecessary—and How the Austrian School of Economics Breaks the Cycle by Harry C. Veryser.  Understand the big picture and the history of boom and busts.

The Money Wars: The Rise and Fall of the Great Buyout Boom of the 1980’s  by Roy C. Smith. He also has many other books on the history of finance through the eyes of an investment banker—check for his books.

The Takeover Game by John Brooks. Chronicles the buy-out boom of the 1980s.

Deals from Hell: M&A Lessons that Rise Above the Ashes by Robert F. Bruner.  Good and bad mergers.

The Funny Money Game by Andrew Tobias.  Conglomerate Boom

The Mind of Wall Street: A Legendary Financier on the Perils of Greed and the Mysteries of the Market by Leon Levy.  I thought the book could have been better, but you still get to learn from a legendary financier.

Extreme Value Hedging: How Activist Hedge Fund Managers Are Taking On the World by Ronald D. Orol.  Investment bankers might take the other side of these battles.

F. I. A. S. C. O: by Frank Partnoy.  A classic on financial shenanigans.

A Devil of Our Own Design: Markets, Hedge Funds, and the Perils of Financial Innovation by Richard Bookstaber. The inside story of the derivatives fiasco.

Books by Lewis like Liar’s Poker.

 Making Investment Banker Presentations

Never forget to give the client what they expect or this might happen:

A Moral Dilemma

Sacrifice

When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic–Dresden James

The Moral Dilemma

Please share with us how you would handle the following moral/ethical quandary. There is no “right” answer but pretend your goal is the greatest good for the greatest number in the long run or, conversely, the least harm to the fewest people. Prize emailed.

Here goes:

A group of children were playing on two railway tracks, one still in use while the other disused. Only one child played on the disused track, the rest on the operational track.

TRAINThe train is coming, and you are just beside the track interchange. You can make the train change its course to the disused track and save most of the kids. However, that would also mean the lone child playing on the disused track would be sacrificed. Or would your rather let the train go it way?

Please explain your choice. Hint: the above dilemma is relevant to economics and investing. What would YOU do?

I will post my reply tomorrow…………until then.

Inspiration from Jim Rogers

inspiration

Update: 11:15 AM March 11, 2013–I was hacked so if you received and email from me, please delete and ignore.

I apologize. Please take the time, though, to understand this:

http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc130311.htm

Investing: Find Your Own Way

“Everybody’s got to find their own way. Listening to me, maybe it’s fun, maybe it’s boring, who knows, you’re not going to succeed until you find your own way. I mean if you’re a musician you’ve got to find your own sound, your own way. Great musicians through history were the people who had their own madness, and were proud of their madness, especially if it was not what everybody else is doing. Well, the same is true of art, literature, politics, finance…especially finance. Yeah, you can copy other people, and many people do, that’s why everybody invests in the same thing, and that’s why it winds up being a bad investment. No, you’ve got to figure out your own way, no matter how absurd your way may sound, especially if your own way sounds absurd to others, you should pursue it even harder. You can learn from other people, but don’t try to be like Joe or Sally, try to be like yourself.”in Investor Guide

People Really Need To Invest In Only What They Know A Lot About

“Well, nobody should invest in anything that they themselves don’t understand. So if I sat here and said you should do x, y, z, and people don’t have a clue what I’m talking about, they should probably ignore what I say or even what you say. Nobody should invest in something that they don’t understand. If you know nothing about gold except that it’s supposedly valuable, you shouldn’t buy it, or invest in anything you don’t know about. But once you know a lot about something, you will probably figure out some ways to protect yourself. I mean if you have your own business, like you, usually the best thing to invest in is your own business, because you know more about that than anything else. I have various ways that I’m trying to protect myself, but even if I told you I’m doing x, I might change my mind tomorrow afternoon, and then you would be stuck doing x because I said it. I’m not going to call you and tell you I changed my mind on that position. So people really need to invest in only what they themselves know a lot about.” – in a recent interview with Investor Guide

My Success Came From Homework

“To the extent that I had any success, it was from homework. I was willing and able to work harder than other people, but I was also willing and able to think differently from other people.” in Smart Planet

http://jimrogers-investments.blogspot.com/2013/03/travel-few-fantastic-places-to-visit.html

Reader’s Question on Arbitrage

Testtost

 Reader’s Question

Please post your question rather than email directly to me (unless you do not get a response within two days) because (1) Other readers probably have similar questions and (2) your email may go into spam or be overlooked.

Don’t be embarrassed. If you ask, “What is a balance sheet?” I won’t give you the answer but I will tell you where to look and how to learn on your own.

Question

I’ve mentioned this before but I’m an avid reader of the blog. I’m currently going through your old posts one by one and learning a lot. Yours is one of 2 or 3 other blogs that I am reading the archives.

My question is about arbitrage (tenders and merger arb). I’ve been reading through Buffett’s old letters and in the late 1980’s he had quite an impressive run with his arbitrage investments (I think in 1987 he made around 80% on his arb investments).

Both he and Graham seem to have had long time success for decades using merger arb and other arbitrage techniques. Buffett mentioned in one of his letters that during the 63 years that Graham, Buffett LTD, and Berkshire practiced arbitrage, they made 20% annually on that strategy.

I’m wondering how often you employ any of these strategies in your portfolio? I’m also wondering if it’s more valuable to spend time working on tradition valuations of companies before treading into this highly specialized area? I think you mentioned you look for liquidations when the market gets too high, which I would group into this special situations category. It seems like a specialized area, but also seems like an area that would add uncorrelated returns to the portfolio, and serve as a great substitute for cash when markets begin to become overvalued.

Would love to hear your thoughts on merger arb if you have time… Thanks

My Reply

First, you should learn about arbitrage because all investing involves some form of arbitrage. Typically, the average investor takes an immediate to 6 month view but value in equities must be measured over the company lifetime (equities are perpetual securities) so value investors use time arbitrage to benefit. Also, spin-offs are one area to find uneconomic selling. Pursue your studies.

Read Klarman’s book Margin of Safety, Greenblatt’s Genius Book, Berkshire’s letters and then look at past deals. Then go where you have the least competition–micro-caps going private, liquidations, etc.  Oddball Stocks is one blog and there are others to learn from.

I am opportunistic, but I have found over the past few years there has been so much money with low-to-zero interest rates competition that the spreads have been too narrow. Then when there were deals like Burlington Northern buyout from Berkshire back in 2009, the spreads were OK–18% annualized but at that time you could buy MMM at or under $50.

MMM

Pursuing merger arb depends upon your opportunity set. Also, don’t compete against the big trading desks on Wall Street–it isn’t worth the risk/reward.

I had a successful merger arb in Burlington Northern but I took my eye off ball in not investing more in the obvious. If I bought around $50 to $55 per share, today I would have a 5% growing dividend yield and a double plus tax deferral.

Today, I feel the environment for many stocks is like this:

However, there are sectors like small gold and silver mining stocks that are in a huge bear market–and for good reasons–but there are opportunities in the areas with the most hatred and plunging prices. Meanwhile the mania in cloud stocks like CRM continues.

There have been companies like NVDA and Intel that offer a more than fair price, but risks are higher than owning a NVR or SYK in the $50s.  My first goal is to find compounders–franchises that can compound capital over time (rare), then buy franchises at slight discounts (20% to maybe 30%) and sell when the margin of safety disappears like today with NVR.  Then I look for special situations or net/nets.

You have to be flexible and go where you find opportunity but understand the drawbacks of each approach and your own limitations.  So recently, I have few special situations in my portfolio but that shouldn’t stop you from pursuing special sits. Just know why you have an edge.

Good luck.

 

Are You Trying Too Hard; Research Tip; Loews and Berkshire; More

EGO

Capitalism without bankruptcy is like Christianity without Hell.–The Two-Penny Philosopher

Looking back at the numerous pronouncements, the numerous projections Bernanke has made over the years, and it quickly becomes evident that he has seldom been right about anything. ….He has  yet to figure out that the present crisis is one not of liquidity, but of solvency. American and European central banks, for ten or fifteen years, supplied too much liquidity to the market. There was too much cheap money available. It led to the housing and consumption bubbles, and when those bubbles burst, the world was left with a credit problem.

Loans today are not unavailable to people who are reasonably solvent; liquidity is not the problem. The problem is that too many people are bankrupt.

Bernanke does not seem to understand this. During the Great Depression, LIQUIDITY was indeed the problem. Thanks to misguided government policies, trade began to dry up, there was no liquidity to support the banks, and the whole system collapsed. Unable to distinguish between liquidity and solvency, Bernanke sees the current crisis as the 1930s all over again.

inflation_2008

….But you do not solve the problem of too much debt with more debt. If printing money led to prosperity, Zimbabwe would be the most prosperous country in the world. inflationpics251108

–Jim Rogers from Rogers RECOMMENDED!

Are You Trying Too Hard? http://greenbackd.com/2013/03/07/do-you-think-you-might-be-trying-too-hard/  A fantastic read–if you only read this, you will do better as an investor!

Loews Adjusted Book Value Analysis (Great blog!) http://brooklyninvestor.blogspot.com/2013/03/loews-adjusted-book-value-update.html

Berkshire Hathaway’s Investments per Share http://brooklyninvestor.blogspot.com/2013/03/value-of-investments-per-share.html

Net/Nets: http://www.oddballstocks.com/

Research Tip: https://www.santangelsreview.com/2013/02/21/another-tool-in-the-due-diligence-toolkit/

What I am reading now:

Investment_Case_for_Gold_2002 and Is_Gold_Still_Bull_Market_2008 and Case for Gold Part 2

Have a Great Weekend!

Learning from Money Managers – VALUE VAULT Folder

 

Divert

Human beings are subject to wild swings
in their levels of fear, risk tolerance and
greed. That won’t change. I base my
whole approach on buying when others
are fearful and selling when others are
greedy. The reason Shakespeare is so relevant
still today is that his plays were all
about human nature, and human nature
never changes.
Mark Sellers, 6.19.05

In the folder below there are interviews with hundreds of money managers. Try to find ideas that are relevant to your style.

 

 

What’s Happening and What’s Gonna Happen

 

Dow 50

Happy Days, Stock Trader my stocks are going up. Is it because of my astute valuation discipline? Perhaps this (Money Supply Growth)  might be influencing conditions:fredgraph (19)

Last week, Chairman Bernanke clearly stated his position: “In light of the moderate pace of the recovery and the continued high level of economic slack, dialing back accommodation with the goal of deterring excessive risk taking in some areas poses its own risks to growth, price stability, and ultimately, financial stability.”

So Bernanke is saying, let it rain: Helicopter-ben-bernanke-11

How will this end? Last week in front of Congress Fed Chairman Bernanke spoke of the exit strategy once again, “We haven’t done a new review of the exit strategy yet.”

Well, we know how his EXIT STRATEGY will end:helicopter-crash

See more: http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/03/bernanke-money-printing-disease-about.html

By the way, WHO benefits? http://mises.org/daily/6376/Who-Benefits-From-the-Fed  No surprises here–the banks and the government. Guess who pays?

How do we know that?

Inflation Expectations

While important, however, the expectations component of the demand for money is speculative and reactive rather than an independent force. Generally, the public does not change its expectations suddenly or arbitrarily; they are usually based on the record of the immediate past. Generally, too, expectations are sluggish in revising themselves to adapt to new conditions; expectations, in short, tend to be conservative and dependent on the record of the recent past.

In Phase I of inflation, the government pumps a great deal of new money into the system, (Read pages 66 to 74 of this book, mystery of banking) so that Money supply increases sharply.  Ordinarily, prices would have risen greatly but deflationary expectations by the public have intervened and have increased the demand for money, so that prices will rise much less substantially.

Unfortunately, the relatively small price rise often acts as heady wine to government. Suddenly, the government officials see a new Santa Claus, a cornucopia, a magic elixir. They can  increase the money supply to a fare-thee-well, finance their deficits and subsidize favored political groups with cheap credit, and prices will rise only by a little bit! (Conditions as of today, March 5, 2013).

It is human nature that when you see something work well, you do more of it. If, in its ceaseless quest for revenue, government sees a seemingly harmless method of raising funds without causing much inflation, it will grab on to it. It will continue to pump new money into the system, and, given a high or increasing demand for money, prices, at first, might rise by only a little. But let the process continue for a length of time, and the public’s response will gradually, but inevitably, change.

Slowly, but surely, the public began to realize: “We have been waiting for a return to the good old days and a fall of prices, but prices have been steadily increasing. So it looks as if there will be no return to the good old days. Prices will not fall; in fact, they will probably keep going up.” As this psychology takes hold, the public’s thinking in Phase I changes into that of Phase II: “Prices inflation expectations will reverse from deflationary to inflationary.

The answer will differ from one country to another, and from one epoch to another, and will depend on many subtle cultural factors, such as trust in government, speed of communication, and many others. In Germany, this transition took four wartime years and one or two postwar years. In the United States, after World War II, it took about two decades for the message to slowly seep in that inflation was going to be a permanent fact of the American way of life.

When expectations tip decisively over from deflationary, or steady, to inflationary, the economy enters a danger zone. The crucial question is how the government and its monetary authorities are going to react to the new situation. When prices are going up faster than the money supply, the people begin to experience a severe shortage of money, for they now face a shortage of cash balances relative to the much higher price levels.

See Case for Gold Part 2

Phase 3 of inflationary expectations leads to a flight from fiat currency (Let’s hope this does not happen) Billionaires

which often leads here: HitlerWithWhip2