Category Archives: Investor Psychology

Investor Presentations and Munger Mash

Munger

Everything Charlie Munger_A Compendium of Articles

Robotti:

He is a deep value investor in small caps.

VII_Aug2011_BobRobotti and Robotti-ValueInvestingCongress-100212

Ghazi:

VII_Oct2010_Ghazi and Ghazi-ValueInvestingCongress-100112  Learn more by downloading the annual reports (3 years) and proxies, study and try to value the company. THEN read his presentation. Do you agree/disagree? I bet less than 1 in 10,000 people would make the effort. While I bet some “investors” bought LAYN on their crackberries/IPhones after a few words by the speaker. You can do better. Make the effort and go the extra mile.

More

VII_May2011_LloydKhaner and Khaner-ValueInvestingCongress-100212

VII_March2007_BarryRosenstein and Rosenstein-ValueInvestingCongress-100112

VII_Feb2007_AlexRoepers and Roepers-ValueInvestingCongress-100212

VII_Dec2010_JeffUbben and Value Investing Congress presentation-Tilson-10-1-12

Bill-Ackman-Value-Investing-Congress-100112

Buckley-ValueInvestingCongress-100112

Gottfried-ValueInvestingCongress-100212  (obscure micro-caps)

Mauldin-ValueInvestingCongress-100112

McGuire-ValueInvestingCongress-100112

Tongue-ValueInvestingCongress-100212

VII_March2005_DavidEinhorn

Hollywood Course on Wall Street–Better than any MBA!?

Working on Wall StreetMargin Call: http://youtu.be/0rqofLr9HE0

The way to make money on Wall Street- Margin Call: http://youtu.be/xOO1NY6ctYU

You are getting fired-Margin Call: http://youtu.be/2f2kGHcdJYU

Danny Devito as Ben Graham in Other People’s Money, “Show me the numbers.” http://youtu.be/yypj-aYtp9c

Danny Devito as “Larry the Liquidator” says, “I’m NOT your best friend, I am your ONLY friend” http://youtu.be/p7rvupKipmY

Boiler Room: “RECO!” http://youtu.be/4zakyg3thfY You could do a thesis on all the psychological ploys used to make this sale.  Also, http://youtu.be/izOIOvguncU  Always be closing!

Wall Street: “Because it’s wreckable.”http://youtu.be/2Mr4mjeZ2ko

Trading Places: Learning about commodities: http://youtu.be/7EjdC0pjo1A

Valuation Study in Trading Places, “Well, in Philadelphia, it is worth 50 bucks: http://youtu.be/jLo7tHDHgOc

Auction market: http://youtu.be/uZ94J09IsHA

Trading Soybeans (How would you like to do THAT all day?) http://youtu.be/XZEBz01t5vg

In those short clips you will grasp more than many beginning MBAs of how the world works.  Good luck!

Appendix: Comment: A movie like this is not a sign of a Bull Market. The movie reflects and/or caters to the Public’s disgust with Wall Street.

| SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2012

Wall Street Meets Hollywood. Greed Ensues.

By MARTIN FRIDSON | MORE ARTICLES BY AUTHOR

A review of the new Richard Gere vehicle, Arbitrage, in which a wealthy hedge-fund manager is—surprise—the villain. Suggestion to the filmmakers: Check the dictionary before you title your next movie.

“Arbitrage—buying low and selling high—depends on a person’s ability to determine the true value of any given market,” reads the program note for the Sundance Film Festival, where writer-director Nicholas Jarecki’s movie Arbitrage was screened to rousing acclaim in January.

From the start, then, someone got the definition wrong. Whoever wrote that program note apparently believes arbitrage—simultaneously buying and selling the same asset at difference prices—is just another form of value investing (“buying low and selling high”).

Call me a purist, but if you pay good money to watch a movie called Arbitrage, you should get to see a little of it. Arbitrage depicts nobody in the act of arbitrage. Not that this would be the first time title and content diverge. At least the hedge-fund manager in Arbitrage does engage in hedging (laying off risk), unlike some real-life firms that call themselves hedge funds without actually hedging.

image

If Arbitrage were a bond, it would make investment grade, but just barely.

Richard Gere stars as Robert Miller, a successful hedge-fund manager who illegally covers up a $400 million loss, then attempts to escape the consequences by selling his company. The sale becomes more difficult when he commits another crime in the course of a bit of wife-cheating with a sexy art dealer. That leads to a second coverup and to a breach with his adoring and idealistic daughter, who is also the firm’s chief investment officer.

Compared with other films on finance worth seeing—admittedly, a short list—Arbitrage fails to give the stock market a pivotal role. Director Oliver Stone’s Wall Street, which features Michael Douglas as takeover artist Gordon Gekko, creates tension with a takeover battle. That film also shows protagonist Charlie Sheen breaking the insider-trading laws instead of just telling the audience about it.

In Boiler Room, the most engrossing action consists of penny-stock salesmen conning their victims. By contrast, Gere’s Robert Miller has already committed his financial crime by the time the action begins.

It might be objected that Arbitrage would lose the average moviegoer by dwelling on the details of securities transactions. But the excellent finance film Margin Call, which does depict margin calls, manages to convey the essential facts about complex derivatives to a general audience. By declining the challenge of portraying finance on-screen, Arbitrage becomes a film as much about its peripheral subjects—police work, the art world, and philanthropy—as the stock market.

BEYOND BEING MISNAMED, the film lacks one key ingredient of the most enduring investment-oriented movies: an instantly quotable line. Wall Street had “Greed is good.” The cult favorite Boiler Room had “You got a cannoli you can stick in your mouth?”—followed by a rejoinder that is not printable in a family magazine. The best Arbitrage can offer is this response to the observation that it’s a cold world: “You’d better get a warm coat.”

The Bottom Line

In addition to being a thriller with few thrills, Arbitrage even bungles the meaning of its title. Wait for this one to come to cable.

But hey, this is a movie: Whether or not Arbitrage holds up as a finance film, is it a decent popcorn picture that spins a suspenseful yarn? It benefits from some good acting. Richard Gere is more than adequate in the lead. Susan Sarandon, already experienced at playing Gere’s long-suffering wife (in Shall We Dance?), again fulfills that duty with finesse. Tim Roth and Nate Parker shine in supporting roles. CNBC’s Maria Bartiromo plays Maria Bartiromo in a cameo that adds luster to the proceedings.

Key plot twists are at times cleverly foreshadowed. Characters reveal unexpected depth as they confront not-so-easy moral choices. A tearful embrace that occurs at a funeral is a powerful use of dramatic irony, and the story’s resolution denies viewers any smug satisfaction that all’s well that ends well.

But these individual touches are too infrequent. If Arbitrage were a bond, it would make investment grade, but just barely.

This shortfall raises the question of why Arbitrage garnered such raves at Sundance, even spurring talk of an Oscar for Richard Gere. The critics’ huzzahs are hard to explain on purely cinematic grounds. As an exploration of family betrayal, Arbitrage is no more than workmanlike. Unlike the best thrillers, it will leave most stomachs unknotted.

THE SUNDANCE CRITICS WERE probably won over by writer-director Jarecki’s choice of a fashionable political theme, the 1% versus the 99%. And you can never go wrong in Hollywood by making the businessman the villain.

Gere’s Robert Miller stands a good chance of prevailing over the law-enforcement system, thanks to his immense wealth, unlike the working-class youth he draws into his crime, played by Nate Parker. The detective, played by Tim Roth, who pursues Miller openly complains that he is in an unfair fight if he must pursue such a privileged perpetrator without having license to fake the evidence. To compound the corruption at the top, we learn that Miller cut corners even in the supposedly lawful phase of building his fortune.

Arbitrage will be released in theatres Friday, Sept. 14. Will media critics also be seduced by the film’s populist theme, or will they judge it according to more rigorous standards of movie-making? That question is as suspenseful as anything you’re likely to see in Arbitrage.

MARTIN FRIDSON is the global credit strategist and CEO of FridsonVision.  He reviewed the film version of Atlas Shrugged last year.

What Can We Learn from IBM?

PS: I may not post the See’s Candies case study until tomorrow….backed up with work. Until then, tackle this:

Why did Buffett buy IBM?

IBM_VL    Don’t cheat! Look at the Value-Line and write what Buffett sees in IBM. (Disclosure: I own IBM along with BDX, BCR, CSCO, LXK, NVS, TESCO, ORI, etc. and I will not announce if and when I sell. I may be incorrect in the assessment of those businesses either in price paid or assessment of value.)

What do you think of IBM’s growth? Is this a good business? What might be driving returns for shareholders? How would you classify this company?  A rapid compounder? Value trap?

How can a company as well-known as IBM become mis-priced?

Hint: For those who wish to start your own fund….research the studies on horse track betting where favorites are SYSTEMATICALLY under-bet (under priced) while long shots are SYSTEMATICALLY over bet or over priced.

Notes:

Betting on Favorites

See research:Favorite_Longshot_Bias

http://www.gogerty.com/blogpersonal/2012/09/

One of the common criticisms I (Investor lecture at Columbia GBS) hear about this type of investing is that it is akin to betting on favorites at the race track. Once you have identified a company that is so obviously superior, how likely is it to be undervalued since the whole world will have perceived that it is an extraordinary company? The stock won’t have a margin of safety and may be persistently over-valued. The stock may be over-loved and overvalued.

Let me back up a second. As part of my misspent youth, I spent a lot of time in horse racing and handicapping. In fact, bettors in aggregate in pari-mutual betting are, in fact, very good at picking winners at the racetrack. Favorites do win races. But betting on favorites does not make you money; it loses you the least amount of money. Because there is a tremendous track take. So the horse racing/handicapping is a minus 20 percent on typical betting. If you just put money down on favorites as a mechanical system, the record shows that you will lose over time only 2%, 3% or 4%. If you bet on long shots, you will lose 20+% of your money.

Now in the case of the stock market over a long period of time, it has been a plus 9, plus 10, plus 11% game so it is very much more favorable business than horse betting. But betting on favorites, betting on quality as opposed to junk is a winning bet, as long as the valuation discipline is appropriate.

Prize awarded: Boom, Gloom, and Doom Report for the BEST reply.

Ok, now take a look at these articles: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/11/14/warren-buffett-ibm/

and  http://seekingalpha.com/article/510371-what-does-warren-buffett-see-in-ibm

Lessons learned?

If I can stress anything–and it took me TEN years to learn and I fall off the wagon occasionally–keep things simple!

A Reader’s Question on BDX

BDX was first mentioned here:http://wp.me/p1PgpH-1c6

Reader: “Should I buy BDX?”

Reply: The penalty for asking this question-the gauntlet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1BoNgCR8NU

You would be insulted if I told you whom to marry. Why should investing be any different? You have to think for yourself and apply principles through your own skills, interests and the opportunities in front of you today and (perhaps better) tomorrow.

Don’t end up like this (click on 4o second mark): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPV2L2CGWdQ.

Lesson

The lesson with BDX is that sometimes the stable, slow growth franchises with management that has the proper capital allocation plan might be able to generate above market returns for those with weak stomachs.

This is not an earth shattering insight. Look below at BDX compared to the S&P 500. Note the much lower price movement down in 2009 and up in 2009-2012. the company’s results are much more stable and better than the average company.

Look at page 3 in the BDX annual report, BD_2011ar. BDX’s stock price returned 3.66% compounded annually over a five-year period from 2006 compared to the S&P 500.  Will that condition continue? No one can know with 100% certainty, but I am betting my largest risk is boredom.

Note this Morningstar Video on market expectations: http://www.morningstar.com/cover/videoCenter.aspx?id=566021

Don’t fear nor expect too much. But if you can find an investment with a larger discount to your estimate of intrinsic value or, more likely, you require higher returns, then avoid BDX.

Asking ME whether YOU should buy is absurd. What YOU need to do is develop an investment process that will help you search, find, value and size the best portfolio for yourself. No one can do it for you. It’s a lonely but interesting road.  Embrace it.

Have a Great Weekend!

Behavioral Finance; Pop Quiz on BDX

Munger’s Mental Models: http://robdkelly.com/blog/models-frameworks/munger-mental-models/

Lesson-on-Elementary-Worldly-Wisdom-Charlie-Munger

Another Great Blog: http://www.frankvoisin.com/  Search.

All things Montier: http://www.eurosharelab.com/james-montier-resource-page. Follow links to his 2002-2011 papers.

—-

Pop Quiz

Your boss says to put together a conservative portfolio, so naturally you start flipping through the Value-Line which you do religiously each week–glancing at every page of the 250 pages of Value-Line.  You come across BDX_VL.

What two or three things do you notice? for a passing grade what ONE (1) metric should jump out at you!  What pile would you put it–investigate, ignore, potential short?

Many “hedgies” and Wall Street “Analysts” miss this but YOU won’t.

Please keep replies short, two or three sentences at most. Prize emailed to the best response.

Reply:

I wanted to see whether you picked out:

  1. The announced $1.5 billion plan to buy back shares or about 10% of the outstanding shares. Couple that observation with the steady buy back/shrinking of shares with increasing dividend payments. Management is serious about return of capital. They get it. At least they are not empire builders.
  2. The consistent and high ROC of 15% or more over the past 12 years. Note that the business was barely dented in 2008 and 2009. Sales and cash flows rose. This is a stable business in the face of a credit crisis, so demand for their services/products seems inelastic. Good. They probably have pricing power.
  3. The company has debt-say around $5 billion but in light of its steady cash flows and 0.89 debt-to-equity ratio, the company is well-financed. Not the difference in capitalization structure with another slow growth franchise: CLX_VL! Management knows that the company has excess capital and slow growth ahead of it, so capital is being returned to shareholders.
  4. This company is a slow, growth decent business with profitable growth. Probably the moat is not due to proprietary patents. My guess–subject to reading a few years of annual reports and MD&A discussions in the 10-K–is that BDX has a powerful distribution network coupled with some customer captivity.
  5. Nobody addressed why this might be mispriced (assuming that it is)? Note the dotted line that goes up sharply during 2007/2009 then has dropped for the past 3.5 years. The price has gone “nowhere.”  Certainly the stock price has “underperformed” the general market. Why?

Value PER share has been rising and management is set to shrink the share count further at these “reasonable” prices. I can’t say that the current price is attractive for you because of your return requirements. Have reasonable expectations, since I doubt BDX will double in price in the next two years. However, I CAN say, based on the numbers that this company is more stable operationally, generates higher returns than most businesses and near term returns will be driven by return of capital over the next few years, so my risk might be lower–than the average company. Yet, the company is priced at or below a market multiple. Now, even if the long bond Treasury was 6% instead of 2.9%, would this be interesting? Yes.

If I can find 20 to 25 of these companies at moderate discounts (15% to 25%), I might be able to preserve my capital over time.  These stable companies rarely provide steep discounts to intrinsic value, but you have the benefit of profitable growth over time. The price you pay, ironically, has to be more precise than when buying a micro-cap due to the moderate price discount.

Prizes will be emailed out. Thanks. Excellent responses. Please take my grades with a large dose of salt 🙂

Let me know if you enjoyed your prizes:

Gravity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=y4znJTziDg4&feature=endscreen

Bad Teacher: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=h6E0Shqba6g&NR=1

Do Not Listen to “Experts” or Jim Cramer on Facebook (FB) IPO; Update on VALUE VAULT

Mad Money’s Jim Cramer came out strong on the Facebook IPO, claiming they were “too legit too quit” claiming he had better experience than anyone to call this. Sad day for the Mad Money host, looks like an epic fail.

See Cramer in action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKJSuBMr4u0

Who is to blame? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSgKV6zJdHs

Cramer, again, takes no responsibility. Surprised?

Avoid “experts”

If you are a beginning investor struggling to find a way to invest then take the above as a lesson on what NOT to do. Make your own mistakes.  Jim Cramer is not an “expert” on Facebook. He did not value the company; he is only there to generate excitement.  Readers of this blog would at least know to figure out what expectations were built into the price of F. Go here: http://wp.me/p1PgpH-PM. High expectations for future growth can be lethal to the share price if those expectations decline. Spend your time reading annual reports in the companies that interest you not watching CNBC.

Analysts’ predictions:http://www.astrocyte-design.com/interests/analysts.html

Prudens Speculari

A further commentary from Prudens Speculari: Social Networking Junk. (Warning: this blogger despises MBAs).

I haven’t touched on the social networking sector in some time so I thought I would today. These gems are really something to behold. The sector is highlighted by Facebook ticker FB. What do you say about this? The chart says it all. The latest news is the sale of a huge whack of stock by insider Peter Thiel.

All the experts out the woodwork now that the horse has left the barn. I especially enjoyed the laughable rant by Jim “any investor who can get shares of Facebook should purchase as many as possible Mad Money 0516/12” Cramer the other day regarding the Thiel sale of stock. Funny how Jim gets lathered by an insider selling out, which by matter of fact is EXACTLY what an IPO is, yet the billion dollar purchase of a NO revenue, NO profit less than 2 yr old startup company Instagram (or Instacam as it should be called) is not concerning? Sadly for the minions who follow the pied piper of hype, the common denominator for Jim Cramer is if things are going up “who gives a shit”, but when things tank, look out cause he’s a scapegoat huntin’.

But it wasn’t just Jim Cramer. The street is full of his ilk. Do you remember these gems.

“I would invest in Facebook, I don’t care what the opening price is”
Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak as part of Facebook pre-IPO hype which should become case study blueprint material for aspiring Wall St. propagandists. So sure Steve, and the rest of us would eat, drink and party like drunken sailors were we worth a couple billion.

“Investors looking to short Facebook stock are getting in front of a freight train”

Needham and Co. senior analyst Laura Martin Wed May 23. 2012 with FB trading around $31-32/share. I didn’t even mention the $40 target she had on the stock. Thank heavens they didn’t let a junior shill, excuse me, I meant analyst near the stock.

Well, the social networking stocks continue to get crushed which is at it should be. Math is math and 2+2=4 no matter how many times a literal army of paid, Wall St. MBA’s tell you it equals 6.

Anyway back on April 23 of this year I had the following posts on twitter regarding some social networks.

“ZYNGA shareholders join GRPN 1’s hope’g 4 an Instagram-esque buyout miracle. Like GRPN, no fraud, simply “growing pains”
That comment about growing pains was from some Wall St. “Henry Blodget-esque’ analyst reassuring the ‘muppets’ that holding the stock that all was well.

“With Wall St. track record sell’g toxic paper I marvel @ the sheep lining up 4 shear’g. IPO shud B renamed ISO. Insiders Selling Out.”
To remind everyone the term ‘muppets’ is how Goldman Sachs fondly refers to its paying clients. I wonder how many Goldman clients out there think, “they can’t be referring to me, gotta be the ‘other clients”

“Don’t forget that other social networking ‘must own’ gem Angies

Update on Value Vault

I finally will have a block of time this weekend to push ahead with reorganizing the material. I know many of you have had troubles getting into the vault. The folders may be over the storage limit for the free accounts. I will speak to customer support this afternoon and find out the issues. Hang in there!

HAVE A GOOD WEEKEND

JCP Potential Case Study; SCAMS and More

JC Penny’s (JCP) Announces Terrible Earnings but The stock rallies

Is the market a discounting mechanism? Jim Cramer of CNBC would say, “JCP is a CROWDED short.” The beginnings of a case study here: JCP_Barrons

Scams

My inbox is being flooded (as a subscriber–to find shorts–to Penny Stock Newsletters my email is raw meat for scammers) with more sophisticated scams: IMF_–_International_Monetary_Fund_SCAM

My email automatically responds to the scammer to call about 50 different (phony) phone numbers in the US to reach me so I can wire funds to help them.

Portfolios

Beyond Buffett_Aug 12 (The old Harry Browne Method of Asset Diversification)

Note: Charlie Munger once said that no one ever got rich being an asset allocator.

Updated: Aug. 13, 2012: from www.economicpolicyjournal.com

The economist and financial author Harry Browne once designed what he
called a “Permanent Portfolio”. The idea behind PP was to create a
portfolio in away that investments were made so that the portfolio
would maintain its value and grow conservatively over time, with
certain parts of the portfolio outperforming other parts of the
portfolio at different times, depending upon the economic
environment—without having to time the economy.

Browne’s idea was to equally divide up a certain amount of money
between various sectors. Because he felt the economy was cyclical, he
felt that when a sector was cheap (and might be poised for a climb)
you would end up buying more unit wise in that sector, if you
allocated your money equally among the sectors,  and less, unit wise,
when prices were higher, BUT that this still resulted in your
participating in all sectors, without having to attempt to time the
exact ups and downs of the business cycle.

There’s a lot to be said  for Browne’s PP.

His four sectors were:

The US stock market via warrants
The 30-year T-bond.
Gold coins.
Cash, i.e.,Treasury bills

This is a good base to work with. However, given that the yield on the
30-year Treasury bonds is so low (2.65%), in my view it makes no sense
to put money in them. Thus, I would put money into only three sectors:
gold coins, Treasury bills and the US stock market.

As far as gold coins are concerned, I would divide up purchases
between both gold coins and  silver coins. And also, if your back is
strong enough, nickels.

Put 33% in nickels of your “gold sector” purchases. They can be
acquired at any bank. Put 33% in gold coins and  33% in silver coins.

Buy only what is known as “junk silver”  (These silver coins come in
bags of $1,000 face value). as for gold buy only “bullion coins” such
as the American Eagle and Canadian Mapleleaf.

If you do not live near a major gold coin dear that has been in
business for at least a decade, consider buying from Kitco.I have
successfully purchased coins via mail with Kitco for many years. If
you chose to use a different dealer, you can use the Kitco prices
online as a guide. One note when buying online, split up your order,
so you don’t risk having an order lost. It’s very unlikely an order
will get lost but take the precaution and split you order up.,Kitco
sends by registered mail and they video tape every step of your coin
order as it is put in a box.

As for Treasury bills, depending upon the size of your purchase, you
can buy them directly from the Fed or through a bank or broker.When
possible, I recommend dealing directly with the Fed.

For those dealing in smaller numbers, I recommend  simply using a bank
account at a “Too Big To Fail” bank.

Browne recommended using warrants for the stock market portion of the
portfolio, there is nothing wrong with this. However, carefully chosen
stocks picks will provide just as much upside potential as warrants,
with less of the downside risk.

Thus to re-cap:

A PP, under current market conditions should look like this:

33% in Treasury bills (or funds at a Too Big To Fail bank)

33% In gold coins (actually split up between 1/3 gold coins, 1/3,
silver coins and 1/3 nickels)

33% in the stock market (with stocks that will benefit from inflation
and also from individual growth trends)

How much should be put into your PP?

It depends upon your age and your wealth. The older you are and the
more wealth you have, the more that should be put into PP. perhaps
100%.

If you are very young and are willing to take on more risk, then
perhaps only 50% of your funds should be in a PP. The rest can be for
more aggressive trading.

The EPJ Daily Alert is about identifying opportunities for the stock
part of the PP and also identifying opportunities for more aggressive
traders.

Below are stocks and other investments that I have previously
identified in the EPJ Daily Alert and are still “active’ investments.
They are designated as PP (permanent portfolio) or AP (aggressive
portfolio) investments.

First, here is my view on nickels a gold coin sector PP investment:

NICKELS

At some point,nickles, which are mostly made of copper, will start to
disappear from
circulation, as the copper price climbs

There is right now approximately 5.0 cents worth of metal in a nickel.
It was much higher before the financial crisis: Close to 7 cents worth
of metal. When I run into someone that does not have a strong
background in investing, I now tell them to buy nickels. You need storage space and a strong back to move them around, but a $100 box of nickels (roughly the size of a very large brick) can be lifted without problem. You can stack
plenty of “bricks” on a hand truck.

What’s great about this investment is that there is no downside. In
the unlikely event that there is no inflation, you can just spend your
nickles.  But you will have to “order” your nickles from your bank. I
tend to try and keep any one order (per bank) to around $2,000 for
both handling (lifting) purposes and so that Ben Bernanke  doesn’t
personally visit to see what is going on.

You can also buy brand shiny new nickels from numismatic dealers for a
small charge, and obviously they don’t ask any questions. But, again, nickels are a great conservative investment  [If you have the space and the back] with zero downside.

One hedge fund manager has reportedly ordered from his bank a million
dollars worth of nickels. I fully expect the coins will eventually
climb in value to at least double their 5 cent  face value price. The
government has made it illegal to melt them down, but you will never have to do anything close to that. When you need to liquidate, just sell them to a
numismatic dealer. Via the magic of black markets, the value (with a
good spread) will track the metal value. You can monitor the value of
the metal in the nickels at the website Coinflation.com.

As part of the PP stock portfolio, I include:

COMMERICA WARRANTS

Comerica (CMA-WT) warrants have much less exposure to foreclosuregate
than other major banks (They are heavy into commercial loans which
will benefit from Fed printing, and the warrants offer an opportunity
to play CMA on a leveraged basis, while limiting risk.  These warrants
were issued by Comerica to the Treasury as part of the TARP program.
Warrants give you great upside leverage with limited downside risk. A
hedge fund manager I know, who has studied these warrants, tells me
they are mis-priced. He tells me traders use the Black_Scholes  option
model to determine value of the warrants, but the manger argues, the
option model undervalues warrants.

For example Comerica warrants expire in late 2018 and the change in
intrinsic value of the warrants will depend on the value of Comerica
in 2017. Which means long-term trends are much more important in these
warrants, and this is not properly taken into consideration in the
short-term thinking of the Black-Scholes model.

Fundoo Professor–Value and Behavioral Investing Blog

http://fundooprofessor.wordpress.com/2012/07/09/flirting-with-floats-part-i/

The above blog is written by a finance professor and professional value investor. A great read.

·         Recent Posts

LexMark (LXK) Developing Case Study

LexMark: Value or Value Trap?

I read the news today, oh boy!

LEXINGTON, Ky., July 12, 2012, Today LexMark announced that second quarter 2012 financial results will be lower than expected.  (Editor: Read analysts need to cover their asses!)

Based on a preliminary analysis of second quarter financial results, the company currently expects second quarter revenue to decline about 12 percent year over year. (Holy #$^&!). This compares to the guidance that the company previously provided in April for the second quarter of an expected revenue decline between 7 to 9 percent year over year. (Editor: Analysts are saying, “What the $%^&! …why didn’t the company tell me?) GAAP earnings per share are now expected to be in the range of $0.53 to $0.55, or $0.87 to $0.89, excluding approximately $0.34 for restructuring-related and acquisition-related adjustments. This compares to the GAAP earnings per share guidance that the company previously provided for the second quarter of $0.65 to $0.75, or $0.95 to $1.05, excluding approximately $0.30 per share for restructuring-related and acquisition-related adjustments.This revised second quarter outlook reflects a weaker than expected demand environment, particularly in Europe (Editor: Who Knew?! What a surprise), and a larger than expected impact from unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates. The weaker demand environment prevented the company from overcoming this currency shift.Looking ahead, the company expects these same factors to impact the second half of 2012 and will provide an update on its full year 2012 outlook on the company’s upcoming earnings conference call scheduled for Tuesday, July 24, 2012.

No conference call will be held in conjunction with this revised financial outlook and the company will have no further comment on this until its upcoming second quarter earnings release.

Analyst Downgrades………..will be announced. (Editor: The horse has left the barn).

5 PM update:

(LXK -16.3%) closes at multi-year lows thanks to an ugly Q2 warning. Goldman (Sell) is taking a hammer to its 2013 and 2014 estimates, declaring the headwinds to Lexmark’s high-margin printing supplies business to be worse than feared. Though no full-year guidance revision was provided, Brean Murray thinks 2012 EPS could be around $4, compared with prior guidance of $4.70-$4.90 – that still gives Lexmark a forward P/E of just 5. HPQ -1.9%. XRX -1.8%.

Upcoming Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call Information

The company will be hosting a conference call with securities analysts on Tuesday, July 24, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. (EDT). A live broadcast and a complete replay of this call can be accessed from Lexmark’s investor relations website at http://investor.lexmark.com .

This Post is to establish a basis for a case study in the future

This post is NOT a recommendation to do what I do (buy LXK today at $20.71) because you may be doing this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go9uekKOcKM.

and here is why I might have a reason to buy: LXK_VL_July 6 12.

In a year or so I can refer back to this dated post. I want to be on record to improve the learning experience and build the case study. Next will the upcoming earnings report in late July. The history, valuation, financial strength, declining business can be discussed later, but for now, this is an attempt to take advantage of Mr. Market. Not everything works out, but we make our way.

Remember to be careful when fools rush in………….Better, perhaps, to follow them to the heart of the American Dream:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_9tZ3aPCFo&feature=relmfu

Have a Great Weekend!

An On-Going Liquidation of Stocks; The Future of Hydrocarbons in the US

http://blog.haysadvisory.com/

Hydrocarbons

As depressing as our political and economic future seems, there is always hope: Manhattan Project on Hydrocarbons and the Future