Category Archives: History

A Contrarian’s Dream (CEF); The Buffetts’ Thoughts on Money

Bankers

Another conviction forced upon my mind, by the examination of long periods of history, was the exceedingly small part played by conscious thought in moulding the fate of men. At the moment of action the human being almost invariably obeys an instinct, like an animal; only after action has ceased does he reflect.” –Brooks Adams in The Law of Civilization and Decay (1897)

Perhaps the only reliable contrary thought one dares hold when monetary innovations are presented is simply one of doubt. Old-timers have confidence only in gold, whereas the younger and “newer” economists are unafraid to experiment with substitutes for what has been called our “barbaric metal.” A speaker contends that gold may be barbaric, “but it is no relic.”

A review of depressions reveals how in every cycle the crisis developed when money and credit became overextended. No answer to the monetary riddle is foreseeable so long as bankers, business-men and speculators act normally, which is that they will push for profits when, and as long as, there is capital gain to be made. They will leave the idealistic “distaste” for money and the power of money to the hippies. 

The trained contrarian recognizes the periods of monetary over-extension and guards against the inevitable “corrections.” He need not understand the riddle of money to avoid its perils.  –Humphrey B. Neill, The Ruminator

 Buy CEF or buying gold and silver bullion at a discount

CEF pricing history

Buy CEF

CEF Five Year

CEF is a closed-end fund that holds gold and silver bullion--currently trading at a 1.5% to 2% discount. Back in 2011, CEF traded at a 6% premium. The present discount is a function of HISTORICAL and UNPRECEDENTED bearishness by small speculators who are currently net short! If ever there was contrarian signal, this is one. Oh, I forgot one, Noureil Roubini, an economist, says that gold will go to $1,000 because the world is in recovery. See below:

Gold & Silver COT Small Specs Net Short

Gold & Silver Short Selling

Commercials at a thirteen year high in bullish positioning

http://www.321gold.com/editorials/mcclellan/mcclellan061713.html

Commercial Hedgers in Gold

In recent years, commercial gold futures traders have been continuously net short ever since late 2001, and so the game consists of evaluating their comparative net short position relative to recent readings.

The reason for this bias to the short side is that a lot of the commercial gold traders are gold producers, who sell their future production ahead of time in the futures markets, and who thus are short. Commercial traders of silver futures have been continuously net short to varying degrees going all the way back to the start of modern COT Report data back in 1986.

In the chart above, the current reading is the commercials’ lowest net short position (as a percentage of total open interest) since 2001, which was when gold prices were just starting a multi-year uptrend from below $300/oz. The message here is that commercial traders as a group are convinced that gold prices are heading higher. They usually get proven right, eventually, although sometimes we have to wait around longer than we might wish for “eventually” to get here.

 

http://www.cefconnect.com/Details/Summary.aspx?ticker=CEF. Now, you may not wish to own gold as a way to hold/store a portion of your savings, but if you are looking for a way to buy bullion, this might be an intelligent way. This writer’s understanding is that  gold is money (all else is credit–J.P. Morgan)–if it wasn’t, then gold’s U.S. dollar price would probably be 50% to 95% lower. Gold is not a currency due to our fiat currency laws (coercion), and gold is NOT an investment. Gold does not create wealth, but it represents wealth/savings. Finally, extreme bearishness may be a contrarian buy signal, but–as in all things pertaining to human action–prices may decline further for a while. No one knows future prices definitively.

However, with high bearishness among small specs in the leveraged paper market with strong commercial traders on the other side of the trade after a two-year decline of 30% to 50% in gold and silver prices, which side do you want to be on?  The theory of contrary opinion aims at avoiding Crowd opinions. That is a broad generality but the reason for avoiding the crowd in most matters is that the crowd is often wrong. A crowd is swayed by emotion and fear rather than by ruminating and reasoning.

Now, why own some gold? Gold is non-printed, non-government created money. If you believe that our current fiat currency/debt laden system is sustainable or that the Fed can “taper” and “exit,” with precision, perfect foresight, and without consequences then just hold paper dollars. If you do own CEF, pray that bullion declines in price because then the rest of your portfolio is probably prospering. Gold is not an investment but simply another form of money.

Warren and Howard Buffett’s Thoughts on Money and Gold

Now where are we today?

View the below videos for a discussion of some economic issues concerning massive debts and zero interest rate policy. The first video is 18 minutes while the next video is 55 minutes.

Arguments given for central planning interventionism and going off the “gold standard” are the periods of booms and busts during the 19th century–forgetting that 1880 to 1913 showed consistent 4% to 5% REAL economic growth while nominal prices declined. Of course, with FRACTIONAL RESERVE banking (Ponzi finance) and regardless of bank notes fully redeemable in gold, there would be booms and busts because credit could be extended through fractional reserves beyond true savings. In other words, money is still being created out of thin air and the currency is not fully-backed 100% by gold (representing true savings). Governments do not enforce a depositor’s property rights by suspending redemption in times of crisis because governments are dependent upon banks for some of their financing. You have to fix all the underlying problems.

Finally, a massive disconnect in reality: Paul Krugman, a nobel-prize winning “economist” says that higher regulatory burdens have NO NEGATIVE effects upon small businesses. How can any one person be so arrogant and ignorant? All he has to do is ASK an entrepreneur/”small” business person DIRECTLY.  If anyone can prove Krugman’s point to me, I  will gladly send you $1 million in gold coins.  As Chicago Slim says, “This will not end well.”

Money Manager Interviews

last-parachute-2

Thanks to www.acting-man.com

Chinese trying to exchange their currency into gold before the arrival of Mao’s triumph over Chiang Kai-Shekgold-store

…and if you want to be a Contrarian, then miners is where you want to be…..0 percent recommendation to own miners by financial advisers (May 13). I guess they didn’t survey me.

miners-zero-percent

Here is a case study question: what caused the past great bull and bear markets in gold and mining shares?

Money Managers

HuntValue_2013-04

MoneyManagerInterviewArticle_Spring_2013

Value_Investor_May_2013

FYI:

June 13, 2013
London, England

[Editor’s note: Tim Price, Director of Investment at PFP Wealth Management in the UK and frequent Sovereign Man contributor, is filling in for Simon this morning.]

As Ben Graham, the father of value investing, observed, an investment operation “is one which, upon thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and an adequate return. Operations not meeting these requirements are speculative.”

Challenged to distil the secret of sound investing into just three words, he advocated: “Margin of safety”. Unfortunately for all investors today, the margin of safety has all but disappeared.

To appreciate just how far away we are from normality or any remotely normal “margin of safety”, consider the chart below:

Chart 1- US.jpg

10-year US Treasury yields are at their lowest levels in more than two centuries. Even stranger is that these low yields exist when the US has never been deeper in debt (nearly $17 trillion for the on-balance sheet liabilities) and thus when the supply of Treasuries has never been as large.

Have the laws of supply and demand been repealed ?

If the US bond market is in a bizarre bubble, it is hardly alone. Consider the even longer data series below, a favourite of MoneyWeek’s Merryn Somerset-Webb, via Church House Investment Management.

Chart 2- UK.jpg

In the more than three centuries’ history of the Bank of England, the base rate has never been this low.

Right now, these western government bond yields are so low because western governments and their central banks are rigging the market in their own debt.

Governments issue debt, only to have their central banks buy it right back. This creates liquidity for commercial banks that can put that money to more productive use– like artificially inflating their stock markets.

Because market manipulation is normally illegal, the monetary authorities have coined a phrase to give their market rigging an air of technical sophistication: quantitative easing, or QE.

Look back at that chart of US Treasury yields. From the austerity post-war years through the go-go years of the 1960s and the stagflationary disaster of the 1970s, T-bond yields rose from roughly 2% to a grotesque 16% in the early 1980s.

But we are now back to 1945 era yields. Do we think the future outlook is for higher yields, or lower ones ? What does the chart suggest ?

This is a nightmarish environment to be practising Ben Graham-style value investing – because the margin of safety has been destroyed by central bank market manipulation.

Western government bond yields are widely held as the ‘risk free rate’ against which other investments can be assessed. Now there is no longer a risk free rate, only the yield available on hopelessly rigged government bonds.

The manipulation of bond markets has inevitable effects upon stock market valuations too; everything is relative. Cash as a meaningful investment choice has also been destroyed by central bank action (see, again, that chart of the UK base rate).

This means that we – and in turn our clients – are forced to take more risk than we would prefer even if our intention is simply to keep our heads above water.

Investors are now obsessed about the prospect of the Fed “tapering” down its bond purchase programme.

Having painted itself into such a corner, having become the prime mover behind both bond and equity market momentum, the Fed may never be in a position to taper anything.

Nevertheless, this is the hand we’ve been dealt and which we must play. We think there is now a significant risk that QE ends (whenever it does end) in a currency crisis.

Since central banks can barely afford to let market interest rates rise any time soon, they will keep the printing presses rolling instead– and most fiat currencies will be printed toward destruction.

So the fundamental rationale for holding gold is as robust as ever in this hopelessly distorted world. But as Pimco’s Mohamed El-Erian now asks, are the markets now beginning to lose confidence in central bankers ? We certainly have.

Until next time, 
  
Tim Price 
 
Director of Investment, PFP Wealth Management
Sovereign Man Contributor

 

Fiat Money Inflation 1790 and Do The Math

Spending

 Can it really be possible to simply print money out of thin air and use it to pay off the world’s debt without there being any consequence?  –Chicago Slim

Let’s Learn What History Can Teach Us………..

BOOKS:

Speculative Bubbles (John Law) bubbles

Fiat Money Inflation in France by Andrew Dickson White inflationinfrance

What Has the Government Done to Our Money by Murray Rothbard: whathasgovernmentdone

How Can We Apply Those Lessons to Our Current Situation?

Here’s Grant Williams presentation to CFA’s via youtube: Do the Math

 James Grant Interview on Central Banks and Gold: http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2013/5/25_James_Grant.html

 

Jim Rogers: ‘Nobody gets out of this situation until there’s a crisis’

http://www.goldmoney.com/gold-research/newsdesk/jim-rogers-interview.html

The Gold Market Today: Acting Man May 31 2013_Gold Market

HAVE A GREAT WEEKEND

PS: A reader donated several books:

Franchise_Value_-_A_Modern_Approach_to_Security_Analysis (Difficult but excellent)

Other books are in Epub format. I am struggling to download and save them so when I do that, I will upload to this blog. 

 

Free Accounting Course from Wharton; Learning from the French Revolution to Invest Today

SOCCER

 And as investors expect the low inflation environment to continue, they have responded by reducing commodity and emerging market exposure and pumping more money into bonds. A net 29% of global asset allocators are underweight commodities, the BofA Merrill study finds, up from 11% in March and at the lowest level since December 2008. Asset allocators are avoiding energy stocks as well.

https://www.coursera.org/course/accounting

About the Course

Accounting is the language of business.  Companies communicate their performance to outsiders and evaluate the performance of their employees using information generated by the accounting system.  Learning the language of accounting is essential for anyone that must make decisions based on financial information.

The course is designed to provide an understanding of financial accounting fundamentals for prospective users of corporate financial information, such as investors, creditors, employees, and other stakeholders (e.g., suppliers, customers).   The course focuses on understanding how economic events such as operating activities, corporate investments, and financing transactions are recorded in the three main financial statements (i.e., the income statement, balance sheet, and statement of cash flows). Students will develop the technical skills needed to analyze financial statements and disclosures for use in financial analysis.  Students will also learn how accounting standards and managerial incentives affect the financial reporting process.

Course Syllabus

The course is broken up into ten weekly modules:

  • Introduction and Balance Sheet
  • Accrual Accounting and the Income Statement
  • Cash flows
  • Working capital assets
  • Ratio analysis and Mid-course Exam
  • Long-lived assets and marketable securities
  • Liabilities and long-term debt
  • Deferred taxes
  • Stockholders’ equity
  • How to read an Annual Report and Final Exam

Recommended Background

The course is recommended for students with little or no prior background in financial accounting that want to improve their financial literacy.  There are no academic prerequisites for the course.  Although we will work with numbers in the course, the only required math knowledge is addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

Suggested Readings

The course is designed to be self-contained.  Students wanting to expand their knowledge beyond what we can cover in this course or who want more practice problems or more in-depth explanations can consult any Introduction to Financial Accounting textbook that is geared toward MBA students.  Because the material in the course has been fairly unchanged for the past few years, any used prior editions of textbooks should be acceptable.

Course Format

The course will combine video of the instructor with Powerpoint slides to the deliver the material.  The lectures will be “interactive” in that the instructor will periodically ask students to pause the presentation and guess an answer before proceeding.  The videos will also cover “case studies” of real companies to illustrate the course concepts.  The course will provide eight short homework assignments and two exams.

FAQ

Will I get a Statement of Accomplishment after completing this class?

Contingent on academic performance, you will get a Statement of Accomplishment stating that you completed this course.  However, no certificate will be given from Wharton / Penn and successful completion of this course does not make you a Wharton / Penn alumnus.

 

What resources will I need for this class?

Everything you need will be provided via the Coursera platform.

 

What is the coolest thing I’ll learn if I take this class?

You will not only better understand what people in the business media are talking about, you will also be able to notice when they don’t know what they are talking about!

About the Instructor

Brian J BusheeUniversity of Pennsylvania


Categories: 
Economics & Finance
Business & Management

The French Revolution and Speculator Joseph Fouche

SSOL_Issue_05

Investors have flocked into financial assets while shunning commodity companies because of China slowdown fears and less “inflation.” What if they are wrong?

Greatest Trades of All-Time; Think Differently

Best-Trades-Of-All-Time

‘How to think’:

It may sound peculiar that contrary thinking is required to achieve creative thoughts… This, however, becomes self-evident when we realize that thinking the way someone else thinks results in mimicry — a “copy-cat” requires the minimum of creative thought… Therefore, the inference is that to achieve any creativeness, some change has to be made. From this, it stands to reason that the optimum in creativeness must approach the maximum change… and the maximum change must be close to the opposite.

Zuce Kogan, Founder of the Creative Thinking Institute

1.      Rid Yourself of Nebulous Terms – Define, Redefine & Refine.

Unless you’re an orator or something it’s highly likely that nebulosity is your enemy. If you speak and think in vague terms, then simple, logical deductions are likely to evade you. But since life involves doing one thing or another, chances are that you’ll default to linking concepts in the ‘default’ way — the way suggested by the crowd. In that case it is likely that the succession of vague, emotive images will govern your action.

The power of words is bound up with the images they evoke, and is quite independent of their real significance. Words whose sense is the most ill-defined are sometimes those that possess the most influence. Such, for example, are the terms democracy, socialism, equality, liberty, etc. whose meaning is so vague that bulky volumes do not suffice to precisely fix it. Yet it is certain that a truly magical power is attached to those short syllables, as if they contained the solution of all problems. They synthesise the most diverse unconscious aspirations and the hope of their realisation.

Gustave Le Bon, The Crowd, A Study of the Popular Mind

Since eccentricity involves a capacity to deal with reality in a supposedly ‘odd’ manner and since the crowd deals mainly in vague images, one clear way to surpass them is simply to define the terms in which you speak and think.

This can seem daunting — especially at first. However, since the crowd remains ever-ponderous and dogmatic, it takes but a very small amount of clarity to achieve oversized gains. One need not plan out the redefinition of one’s entire vocabulary — just start with one concept that you use a lot in your daily life. I expect that the incentive gleaned from the initial reward will be enough to prompt further redefinitions and refinements.

2.      Allocate All of Your Available Resources Contrarily.

Contrary allocation of capital seems to be well-acknowledged as a key to success in certain investment and entrepreneurial communities. However, it also seems to remain compartmentalized as a theory about allocating capital and capital only – I say that if you wish to reach the honourable status of the ‘Mad Man’, it is prudent to apply this theory to all of the resources at your disposal:

                       

Everything that should be managed lies here. Click to enlarge.

INSIDE YOUR HEAD

The truth is that you should allow your mind ruminate contrarily for more than just your money – but also for your time, energy and your attention. The integrated eccentric is he who doesn’t give up in any of these fields.

Whenever you are next faced with a seemingly trivial matter (such as whether or not to read a newspaper, take a taxi or express interest in an uninteresting matter) allow yourself to consider what the ‘common way’ is and just try the opposite.

3.      Adopt a Kantian Distaste for Intellectual Discussion & Stop Checking with Others.

Sometimes, if not most of the time, it is quite unnecessary to acquire the opinions of others before you act. Yet nevertheless I see a strong tendency for people to check and verify trivial and non-trivial matters with one another. This brings about two serious hindrances to the wannabe wacko; 1) it forces you to adapt your language to that of someone that is probably confused and using nebulous terms and 2) it will likely introduce unneeded emotions into your mind.
In order to acquire a sense of creativity I suggest that you act before you tell others about your actions and – in particular – adopt a Kantian distaste for intellectual discussion:

By and large Kant, unlike Socrates, avoided the company of philosophers and philosophically minded fellow citizens. He did this not because of any conviction that philosophers as a breed are inevitably frivolous or consumed by the need to prattle on about their most recent publications; some are, to be sure, and these one would seek to avoid in any case. He was certainly aware that in his field of study there existed colleagues with whom he could talk about bank accounts, ball games or battle plans. But philosophers tend to talk about philosophy. And even if such talk is motivated by infinite charity and fraternal goodwill, it provokes some response, comment or counter-argument to the ideas and theories presented. In print the same arguments have quite a different impact; they can be simply registered without requiring an immediate response, or can be interpreted to suit one’s frame of mind, and as a last resort a page can be turned and a book can be closed. But in conversation courtesy demands that the addressee react and relate himself. And this, in Kant’s view, is a dangerous exercise and one that certainly lacks the productive element that Socrates may have found in it. Philosophers, or so Kant thought, work best in isolation…

4.      Test Your Revelations in Small Ways. Proceed to Fail Small & Win Big.

So by now hopefully you’ve defined at least one term that has significance to your life, considered allocating your time, attention and money contrarily and considered doing something big without checking with anyone at all. Chances are that you may have thought of something interesting. The default consensual reaction is to elaborate a plan in a manner that requires significant resources (be that money, time, energy, attention or whatever else). I urge you to take a step back and consider how you might test it in the smallest possible way.

I’m always astounded by the degree to which people attempt to impose the property of permanence upon themselves. [facepalm] Why oh why? [/facepalm] Permanence through life is most frequently a large and onerous speculation — and indeed a type of speculation that is likely to be unattainable due to the ever-changing nature of each and every living individual. I suggest that if you wish to maintain your newfound eccentric temperament and demeanour, then risk little, lots rather than lots, little. If you risk little, lots you will not suffer the emotional turmoil that accompanies a large drawdown – and if you’re thinking contrarily you’ll likely be risking little for lots.

5.      Acquire Refined Senses of Ignorance & Stubbornness

The final step to eternal quirkdom is to maintain both a refined sense of ignorance and a refined sense of stubbornness. In the first instance, I should define my terms:

By ignorance, I mean a lack of knowledge. By stubbornness I mean an unwillingness to move from one’s intellectual position.

The former ‘sense of ignorance’ is merely a sustained application of point 2) about properly allocating all of your resources. By carefully selecting what enters your mind, you can maintain a temperament where you decide the content of your ignorance (or more precisely the content of your non-ignorance). This term – most commonly used as an insult – is in this sense quite neutral. We all must be lacking in knowledge (since we are not beings of perfect intelligence). Acquiring a refined sense of ignorance is merely rejecting the notion that the crowd should determine what you are not to ignore (and to be sure that determination is perilously nebulous anyhow!).

The latter ‘sense of stubbornness’ is merely the unwillingness to forego logic for the vague images of the crowd. Once again – it is a rejection of the crowd’s vague concept of when you should and should not give up your intellectual positions.

Recommended Reading:

[Full Disclosure: We adore these books and suggest them to everyone we know — but be aware that the links on the left are affiliate links. If you would rather not pass affiliate credit to us then feel free to use the links on the right.]

Free Book on Crowd Psychology: http://archive.org/stream/crowdastudypopu00bongoog#page/n6/mode/1up

http://greshams-law.com (A Great WebSite on Financial History)

HETTY GREEN

Buy or Sell in May and Go Away?

My thoughts exactly: http://www.321gold.com/editorials/moriarty/moriarty051313.html

A History of Interest Rates

History of US Bond Yields

Are conditions deflationary or inflationary? Do bonds have lower to go? If I wanted to short long-term bonds, I would choose corporate bonds over U.S. treasuries because you are fighting a subsidized market of central banks buying  government debt.

WHAT IS AN INTEREST RATE?

An interest rate is the discount that individuals place on the value of future goods compared to present goods. This discount applies to money and everything else. Mises said, “Originary interest is a category of human action. It is operative in any valuation of external things and can never disappear” (Human Action, page 524).

This discount “is a ratio of commodity prices (note contango between June Gold and Dec. Gold), not a price in itself” (p.523. “Originary interest is not ‘the price paid for the services of capital’….It is, on the contrary, the phenomenon of originary interest that explains why less time-consuming methods of production are resorted to in spite of the fact that more time-consuming methods would render a higher output per unit of input” (p. 523). Interest is not profit. Profit is the difference between the purchase price of a good and its sale price, after having deducted the income that would have been earned by placing the money at interest. Profit originates in the entrepreneur’s perception –his guess–that his competitors have underbid the price of some resource, and that future consumers will bid more than his competitors think (p. 532).

Case for Owning Gold Has Collapsed; A Perspective in Silver; Reader’s Question;

GOLD CoinsMoney transmits value, Mises taught, but money does not measure value. This distinction is fundamental in Mises’s theory of money. “Money is neither an abstract numeraire nor a standard of value or prices. It is necessarily an economic good and as such it is valued and appraised on its own merits, i.e., the services which a man/woman expects from holding cash. (Human Action, pp. 414-415). Gary North, Mises on Money

Read more on the value of money: http://www.mises.org/daily/6380/The-Value-of-Money

What is, then, the best monetary policy? He argues that in light of his previous considerations “the state should at least refrain from exerting any sort of influence on the value of money. A metallic money, the augmentation or diminution of the quantity of metal available for which is independent of deliberate human intervention, is becoming the modern monetary ideal.”[17] He adds: “The significance of adherence to a metallic-money system lies in the freedom of the value of money from state influence that such a system guarantees.”[18]

The Case for Owning Gold Has Collapsed; Yellow metal could be headed much, much lower http://is.gd/h5KW6v. Gold could be headed not much lower, but much much lower.  This was written on April 18, when the value assigned to the monetary relic (AKA its nominal price) resided at $1391 per ounce.  So be warned, Mr. Gold advises that gold could go much much lower.  Gold bugs take heed; Mr. Gold himself has put the double ‘much’ whammy on you!

The article: The Gold Dilemma. The article is riddled with logical fallacies. Using CPI and GDP to measure anything meaningful is a fantasy–even forgetting that those indexes are politically constructed by bureaucrats.

Another view of gold’s history: 99816519-Special-Report-Gold-2012-In-GOLD-We-TRUST.

Why I own gold bullion–as a hedge against monetary chaos. Own what the government can’t print.

All the Silver Ever MinedAll the Silver Ever Mined

A reader’s question from the prior post: Am I 100% in cash?  No, I have cash, gold bullion, selected precious metals mining companies, a few other companies, and a tiny short position in certain stocks like GE and CRM.  If you think holding on through thick and thin after buying at the highs EVEN with UNSUSTAINABLE Fed manipulation of money and credit is a good plan, then view page 8 here: A Lesson in Financial History by Mish. Also, for more perspective on the unsustainability of current corporate mean-reverting profit margins see: An Unsustainable Equilibrium_Hussman. View the video presentations here and consider a donation to cure ALS: http://www.winecountryconference.com/2013-speaker-presentations/ People love to follow the crowd and momentum while mal-investment increases, so expect more S&P 500 movement to the upside until–unexpectedly–a surprise hits and people need to sell their “hot potato.”

But if you own great franchises at good prices then you have few worries. I wish I could find them now.

big-money-poll-2Short the SPY and Long PHYS for fun (not for real) at the highest offer for PHYS ($10,000 at $12.30 for PHYS) and lowest bid for SPY ($10,000 shorted at $158.10) on April 25 and lets see where we are in 12 months.

Update on April 29, 2013:bigSPY

Big sm spy

phys

spy

 

Chart Views on Monetary Mayhem

Gold Standard Era

Remember that correlation is not causation. Our eyes make our minds extrapolate.  I use charts to see if the current market facts jibe with my theoretical understanding.  This current boom in stocks will need increasing amounts of credit and money to sustain its rise–but the day of reckoning is never eliminated–just prolonged as the mal-investment increases.

irrational-markets

gold-stocks

http://smartmoneytracker.blogspot.com/

 

Go to http://smartmoneytracker.blogspot.com/ for a FREE trial.

 

 

 

The Great Deformation; Current Conditions; Is Bitcoin Money? Ponzis; Watch the Balance Sheet; Sound Money

Sundown

This freakish central bank accumulation of dollar liabilities, in turn, was the result of the greatest money printing spree in world history. In essence, we printed and then they printed, and the cycle never stopped repeating. In this manner, the massive excess of dollar liabilities generated by the Fed were absorbed by its currency pegging counterparts, and then recycled into swelling domestic money supplies of yuan, yen, won, ringgit, and Hong Kong dollars.

As the US debt-based global monetary system became increasingly more unstable in recent years, central bank absorption of incremental Treasury debt reached stunning proportions. Thus, US publicly held debt rose by $6 trillion between 2004 and 2012, but upward of $4 trillion, or 70 percent, of this was taken down by central banks.

I could be truly said, therefore, that the worlds’ central banks have morphed into a global chain of monetary roach motels. The bonds went in, but they never came out. And therein lays the secret of “deficits without tears.”

David Stockman from The Great Deformation (2013)

Read an interesting article on crony capitalism: Sundown_in_America

Comments on the article: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-01/guest-post-stockman-liquidation

Current Conditions

wmc130401a

The chart is based on data through the end of 2012. Smithers notes “At that date the S&P 500 was at 1426 and US non-financials were overvalued by 44% according to q and quoted shares, including financials, were overvalued by 52% according to CAPE. With the S&P 500 at 1552 the overvaluation was 57% for non-financials and 65% for quoted shares.”

Unfortunately, that seems about right. Let’s translate this into an estimate of prospective 10-year total returns, assuming underlying nominal economic growth rate of about 6.3% (which may be optimistic, but is a robust peak-to-peak norm across economic cycles, and is unlikely to be pessimistic), and a dividend yield of about 2.2% on the S&P 500. With that, a 65% overvaluation in quoted shares, reverting to fair valuation a decade from now, would imply a 10-year annual nominal total return on the S&P 500 of 1.063*(1/1.65)^(1/10) + .022 – 1 = 3.3% annually. That’s right in line with the estimates we obtain from a wide range of other historically reliable approaches (historically reliable in italics, because the “Fed Model” is not).

Notice that in 1982, the -0.7 reading on Smithers’ log-scale chart implied that stocks were undervalued by exp(-0.7)-1 = -50%. At that point, with the dividend yield on the S&P 500 about 6.7%, one would have estimated a 10-year prospective total return for the S&P 500 of 1.063*(1/0.5)^(1/10)+.067 – 1 = 20.6% annually. One would have been correct.

In contrast, note that in 2000, the 1.0 reading implied that stocks were overvalued by exp(1.0)-1 = 172%. At that point, with the dividend yield on the S&P 500 at just 1.2%, one would have estimated a 10-year prospective total return for the S&P 500 of 1.063*(1/2.72)^(1/10)+.012 = -2.6% annually. Again, one would have been correct.

With due respect to Howard Marks and Warren Buffett

At present, we estimate a 10-year total return on the S&P 500 over the coming decade averaging just 3.5% annually, with zero total returns over a horizon of about 7 years, and expected losses for the S&P 500, including dividends, over shorter horizons.

…..The last four years of market advance have reduced FUTURE retruns.

While our estimates for 10-year total returns exceeded 10% annually near the 2009 market lows, the recent advance has, in effect, “eaten” most of those prospective returns. The well-admired bond manager Howard Marks is very correct when he notes “appreciation at a rate in excess of the cash flow accelerates into the present some appreciation that otherwise might have happened in the future.”

Where I differ from even Howard Marks and Warren Buffet here, is that if you are going to rely on a summary measure in order to value long-lived assets like stocks (both Marks and Buffett point to “forward operating earnings” today), that summary measure must be representative of the long-term stream of cash that investors can expect to receive over time. The hook today is that investors are using analyst estimates of next year’s operating earnings as if they are representative of the entire long-term stream, and that this one number can be used as a “sufficient statistic” for long-term corporate profitability.

Read More: http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc130401.htm

Profit MArgins

 

 Jim Rogers on when he was wiped out

 

 

Is Bitcoin money?

Money Diagram

 

No! Summary:

» Bitcoins can be hyperinflated in substance

» Bitcoins can never be the most saleable good

» Bitcoins cannot account for the regression theorem

» Bitcoins are the equivalent of token money

» Bitcoins are the opposite of anonymous

For context, Bitcoin is a newly formed digital currency which has rapidly grown in popularity (as well as in price) following the Cyprus banking system collapse. The chart below is the price performance of Bitcoins, which have seen a market cap expansion of almost 20x—from about $50mm to roughly $1B where it stands today—in less than one year.

Read more…. http://bullmarketthinking.com/bitcoin-bubble-2-0-from-a-monetary-standpoint-they-are-on-par-with-the-stuff-you-find-at-chuck-e-cheese/

 

Watch the balance sheet: Never ignore the balance sheet (Videos).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=X-b62ZYXAyw&feature=endscreen

What is a balance sheet: http://youtu.be/DuKEcxVplnY

Signs a company is in trouble: http://youtu.be/lwp6i4Kd4RA

Why does a profitable company go bust? http://youtu.be/d0FY4xRT_yo

A Ponzi on top of a Ponzi: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?play=1&video=3000148493  This story is unbelievable. A young guy decides to create fake boat titles from fake invoices that he then obtains loans on from his local banker. The banker doesn’t have the brains nor the energy to make a 90 second call to the boat manufacturer to verify the make and model. Nor does the banker even wonder how his customer obtained the money to have 53 yachts.

As the court documents reveal, the con man said it was in the interests of the banker to believe the con! (This I believe). As a plea for leniency, the conman’s lawyer stated that his client ONLY defrauded FDIC INSURED banks! Expect many more ponzis to be revealed.   See: MichaelVorce_AmericanGreedStatement and Vorce_PleaTranscript

Another $600 million Ponzi:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/30/zeekrewards-ponzi-scheme-north-carolina_n_2984347.html?utm_hp_ref=business

SOUND MONEY

Prof Selgin on sound money http://youtu.be/U_0CNwgL8Rw

Dr. Judy Sheldon on the origins of our money: http://youtu.be/hdlZi2KPXhU

Money in crisis part 1: http://youtu.be/TQ4PGr0WBBc

Money in crisis, part 2: http://youtu.be/1mI8Lek60_w

www.moneyweek.com

 

Suggested Reading

Trial Attorney

Reading History

A reader asked me via email about what books to read to understand history. Please post your questions in the comments section because I most likely will lose your email–let others see your thoughts.

http://greenbackd.com/2013/03/04/letter-from-howard-buffett-to-murray-rothbard-i-have-a-son-who-is-a-particularly-avid-reader-of-books-and-panics-and-similar-phenomena/

The book is here http://mises.org/rothbard/panic1819.pdf also read http://mises.org/books/desoto.pdf especially pages 476 to 508 (Empirical evidence of business cycles).

Then read with a critical eye: Fifty Years in Wall Street by Henry Clews (1908) and A Nation of Deadbeats by Scott Reynolds Nelson

Then The Great Bull Market, Wall Street in the 1920s by Rober Sobel

Move on to America’s Great Depression: http://mises.org/rothbard/agd.pdf

Then read Wall Street, A History by Charles R. Geisst.

That will get you started. Don’t forget to read more general history as well such as The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich-the mother of all bear markets for the human race. Couple that with Winston Churchill’s books on European history and WWII for another perspective.

Assessing Managements (See pages 7-9) Assessing Management

The Problem at JC Penney

Days Sales in Inventory

Inventory Turns

Here is a good article that captures the problem at JCP. Essentially a retailer owns or leases space to sell goods to customers. The wider the mark-up and/or the faster the turnover of goods, the greater the profits, return on capital, etc. JCP HAS to get customers in the door AND then get them to buy–obviously.  I don’t agree on all the comparison (Costco vs. a Dept. Store) in the graphs, but you get the picture.

(Days of Inventory = Inventory/Cost of goods x 365 days. Data courtesy of Morningstar.com in TTM time frame.)

http://seekingalpha.com/article/1159231-j-c-penney-and-searsmore-museum-than-store

Any slower inventory management and Penney and Sears might as well advertise in Frommer’s Guide to museums.

Make no mistake: Sears (SHLD) and J.C. Penney (JCP) act more like museums than retailers. They’ve become simply corridors to get to the rest of the mall. The tip off: The two can’t unload their inventory. Goods move at a trickling pace and it’s killing the bottom line.

Check the length of time it takes these brick-and-mortar retailers to move their goods: Costco (COST), Wal-Mart (WMT), Target (TGT), Home Depot (HD), Sears and J.C. Penney. The chart shows how long it takes to turnover inventory. The longer the days of inventory, the longer dollars are tied up.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/439101-have-sears-and-j-c-penney-become-museums

I think Buffett said, “Don’t look for seven foot walls to scale but three inch bumps to step over.”

Finding Quality Stocks

http://greenbackd.com/2013/03/04/how-to-find-high-quality-stocks/

The Quality Dimension of Value Investing

try to couple that with a fair/good price.